Sarah Walker

Yeah. I mean, the first couple sentences of that paper disturbed people a lot. And I think they were really carefully constructed in exactly this kind of way.

Yeah. I mean, the first couple sentences of that paper disturbed people a lot. And I think they were really carefully constructed in exactly this kind of way.

Yeah. I mean, the first couple sentences of that paper disturbed people a lot. And I think they were really carefully constructed in exactly this kind of way.

Oh, it was really fun. But I think it's interesting because... I do, you know, sometimes I'm very upfront about it. I say I'm going to use the same word in probably six different ways in a lecture. And I will.

Oh, it was really fun. But I think it's interesting because... I do, you know, sometimes I'm very upfront about it. I say I'm going to use the same word in probably six different ways in a lecture. And I will.

Oh, it was really fun. But I think it's interesting because... I do, you know, sometimes I'm very upfront about it. I say I'm going to use the same word in probably six different ways in a lecture. And I will.

Yeah, for sure. I mean, this is part of the sort of brilliant thing about our collaboration is, you know, complementary skill sets. So I love playing with the abstract space of language. And it's a really interesting playground when I'm working with Lee because... he thinks at a much deeper level of abstraction than can be expressed by language.

Yeah, for sure. I mean, this is part of the sort of brilliant thing about our collaboration is, you know, complementary skill sets. So I love playing with the abstract space of language. And it's a really interesting playground when I'm working with Lee because... he thinks at a much deeper level of abstraction than can be expressed by language.

Yeah, for sure. I mean, this is part of the sort of brilliant thing about our collaboration is, you know, complementary skill sets. So I love playing with the abstract space of language. And it's a really interesting playground when I'm working with Lee because... he thinks at a much deeper level of abstraction than can be expressed by language.

And the ideas we work on are hard to talk about for that reason.

And the ideas we work on are hard to talk about for that reason.

And the ideas we work on are hard to talk about for that reason.

I think it's a very poor language. A lot of people think it's a really great one, but I think it has some nice properties. But I think the feature of it that is compelling is this kind of idea of universality, that if you have a language, you can describe things in any other language.

I think it's a very poor language. A lot of people think it's a really great one, but I think it has some nice properties. But I think the feature of it that is compelling is this kind of idea of universality, that if you have a language, you can describe things in any other language.

I think it's a very poor language. A lot of people think it's a really great one, but I think it has some nice properties. But I think the feature of it that is compelling is this kind of idea of universality, that if you have a language, you can describe things in any other language.

I don't think that they're outside our human languages. I think they define the boundary of the space of human languages. They allow us to explore things within that space, which is also fantastic. But I think there is a set of ideas that takes, and Stephen Wolfram has worked on this quite a lot and contributed very significantly to it.

I don't think that they're outside our human languages. I think they define the boundary of the space of human languages. They allow us to explore things within that space, which is also fantastic. But I think there is a set of ideas that takes, and Stephen Wolfram has worked on this quite a lot and contributed very significantly to it.

I don't think that they're outside our human languages. I think they define the boundary of the space of human languages. They allow us to explore things within that space, which is also fantastic. But I think there is a set of ideas that takes, and Stephen Wolfram has worked on this quite a lot and contributed very significantly to it.

And I really like some of the stuff that Stephen's doing with his physics project, but don't agree with a lot of the foundations of it. But I think the space is really fun that he's exploring. you know, there's this assumption that computation is at the base of reality. And I kind of see it at the top of reality, not at the base, because I think computation was built by our biosphere.

And I really like some of the stuff that Stephen's doing with his physics project, but don't agree with a lot of the foundations of it. But I think the space is really fun that he's exploring. you know, there's this assumption that computation is at the base of reality. And I kind of see it at the top of reality, not at the base, because I think computation was built by our biosphere.