Scott Besant

And Dana, when you say it's a big question, that's bad framing because the Supreme Court didn't even address that.

The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court.

And, you know, we will follow what they say, but that could be weeks or months when we hear them.

So the Supreme Court did not address refunds.

No, no, no, Dana, it is not up to me.

It is not up to the administration.

It is up to the lower court.

Let's just be clear on that.

Again, I'm not going to get out ahead of the court.

We will follow the court's direction, but as I said, that could be weeks or months away.

That decision was not rendered on Friday.

Donald Trump should return that money immediately.

He has an obligation, $1,751 per family that were taxed by Donald Trump.

He took hundreds of billions of dollars from working folks

from the ag community, from small businesses, for this vanity play, this illegal action.

And he finally was held to account.

The rule of law won out.

Treasury's estimates show that the use of Section 122 authority combined with potentially enhanced Section 232 and Section 301 tariffs will result in virtually unchanged tariff revenue in 2026.

Look, this is what we've been setting the table for for all of 2025.

I've said that repeatedly.