Scott Jennings
speaker
169 appearances
28 recordings
10 series
first heard Dec 2024
last heard 9 Jul
Scott Jennings’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 9 in all, peaking in Jan 2026 with 4.
Appearances
The Dan Bongino Show · Scott Presler On The Ever-Important WI Election | Episode 12 · 1 Apr 2025
podcast
that this liberal court is trying to get rid of voter ID. And you'll see that the League of Women Voters and all the lefty groups want people to vote no to this amendment. I'm asking you, please, you, the people of Wisconsin, have had voter ID in your state.
If you want to enshrine voter ID into the Wisconsin state constitution, making it exceptionally hard for liberals to ever get rid of it, then you must come out today and vote yes. yes to the constitutional amendment. And let me raise this a notch even higher.
One of the most important conservative values that we believe is in school choice, that families, not the bureaucracy, not unelected principals, that it shouldn't be they who choose how families can teach and raise their children, that we believe in school choice as conservatives. And so I ask for your vote for Brittany Kinzer. Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you.
Hey everybody, this is Scott Pressler. I'm here in Brown County. We're getting ready for the Elon Musk event, and as you can see behind me, we have a line of people, and we are going to elect Brad Schimel on April 1st. I need every single person, you come out, you vote in this election. Let's go! Let's go! Let's go! Let's go!
The Dan Bongino Show · Nightly Scroll - Trump-Elon Bromance Triggers The Libs (Ep.03) · 12 Mar 2025
podcast
Teslas, they're cool cars, but the president is clearly trying to do his friend, political donor, actually government employee, a pretty big favor here.
And President Trump had did it before in his first term as well.
How is Trump shredding the Constitution? I mean, seriously?
This is what you do in a dictatorship.
And right now, you're gaslighting, but when we get to the actual rubber of the road of this, it will be clear. I'm interested in this conversation. He's going to put someone in charge who will contravene the Constitution. Like, who? What do you mean by that? The president is in charge of the military, is he not? You said he's going to put someone in charge of the military?
It seems to me that you all both believe that the unelected part of our government, the bureaucracy, has a responsibility to resist the political leadership. Is that your view?
Are you suggesting that the president is not the commander-in-chief of the military?
I'm interested in this conversation. He's going to put someone in charge who will contravene the Constitution. Like, who? What do you mean by that? The president is in charge of the military, is he not? You said he's going to put someone in charge of the military?
He was elected president. We, according to the Constitution, vest all executive authority in a president. And the concept that the military should be an independent agency or that the bureaucracy should resist the political leadership of this government is extraordinarily dangerous. That's literally not what we said. I'm just repeating back to you your own words.
We're doing a complete review of every single aspect of what happened with the botched withdrawal of Afghanistan and plan to have full accountability. It's one of the first things we announced at the Defense Department for that reason, sir. Certainly, General Raisin Kane, who's on his way in, was not a part of that.
Instead, he was a part of leading the effort against ISIS by untying the hands of warfighters and finishing the job properly and bringing our troops home. So we're taking a very different view, obviously, than the previous administration, and there will be full accountability.
And then you have these individual district court judges setting effectively broad federal policy that is specifically reserved for the president of the United States. I think we do have a constitutional crisis, and it's being caused by these judges. They're not here to tell us... They're not here to tell us how to spend the money. They're not here to set broad federal policy.
That is the president's job as elected by the people. These judges are supposed to be settling discrete, specific matters, not policy-setting. I think Vance is right. I think Trump has a point. and these judges want nothing more to continue the lawfare against Trump. I don't think anybody...
Showing 141–160 of 169 · page 8 of 9
← Previous
Next →