Sean Stone

Now it's not gonna be easy, but if they create the cultural shift, and I think is there a lot of people, that's why the red wave came in a way that even the popular vote won. People are sick of the system, right? But the elections are key to me. And it's not about Trump versus Kamala or anybody. If we don't have a clear, like a blockchain style of transparency when it comes to elections,

That's what scares me the most is that we get to this place where you can rig machines, where you stop counting and say, we'll come back tomorrow. We need to get a clear way of doing an election where it's like a blockchain where you can see the results. Because I think there is suspicion, by the way, around some of the down ballot votes this year to this day in some of the states that-

You know, there are questions. I think if you can have blockchain transparency, right, where it's like every vote is there, it's it's accounted for. You can go and you can check your vote and you can see where that's what we need to have as a modern society. And all done in one day, not over the course of a week or three months of voting. I mean, it's just got to be really clear and simple.

Democrats don't. Oh, I know. I'm saying, but now is the time to change it. If we don't change it, I'm very concerned about our freedom.

I'm independent. I don't fall into any category. I consider myself a constitutional Republican. I like the Constitution of the United States being a limited republic, being a limited federal government.

and here we don't we never judge ourselves we always say that's the the other side is doing we're known to rig elections like it's known the cia has rigged elections abroad right we know that for a fact so it's so hard why is it so difficult for us to fathom the cia having rigged elections abroad i'll get you could be involved and it's the same chicken chicken come home to roost which raises of course the assassination attempts on trump i don't know man it's so strange

It was a disgusting moment. There's a good point that these wars in the Middle East, as Wesley Clark pointed out, it's basically the neocon agenda. And a lot of these neocons are dual Israeli citizens. And so it's like, who has benefited? We were with Shimon Peres when he said... The Iraq war benefits us.

You know, he said that during the, I remember very clearly, he's like, secures our border against Saddam, right, on the Iraq side. The wars are all, you know, it's, as Jeffrey Sachs pointed out, this is all Israel's policy with the Middle East. It's almost like we've basically said, okay, whatever Israel wants in the Middle East, we'll do.

up and including the Syria thing, which I'm curious your position. But in the series, we get into this, how much, as we know, we supported creating these Al-Qaeda in Iraq and ISIS groups, right? Jihadists, which we did in Afghanistan, by the way, in the 80s. And we've done it in Libya against Qaddafi, which was insane, right?

And we did the same thing now with Syria, where again, another terrorist group is now in charge. I mean, it's pretty... wild to understand that we've been fomenting these jihads against going back to the days of Nasser, by the way. Actually, there's a long history.

I think Devil's Crusade is a good book on the topic about CIA sponsorship of Muslim Brotherhood types and others against any nationalist, any Arab nationalist. And who does that ultimately benefit? Unfortunately, it's is Israel, because Israel hated Nasser, right? An Arab nationalist. It's not from the American perspective.

They'll say, right. We have dual citizenship with France. I mean, I don't think there's an issue with dual citizenship. The problem is that the loyalty that we find tends to be a Zionist approach. And Israel itself is not to me. It's like, I don't, I don't think there's any issue with Israel's existence, but the Zionist position is oftentimes greater Israel.

I think you have to think about it as a... It's like a club in a way, right? And the amount of financial influence, think about the banking side of things. Think about the infrastructure of banking. A lot of this does connect to Judaism. And it's not to say that they're bad people, but essentially, yes, there is a deep, deep, deep love and loyalty to Israel.

It's interesting because we could be Israeli citizens based on our ancestry. Our ancestry of Lew Stone is not Zionist. Our ancestry is much more cosmopolitan. And this kind of goes to the heart of a lot of the issues, I think, at the beginning of Zionism, where the cosmopolitan Jews who said, we want to assimilate into the cultures, right? Of Germany, of Europe, of America.

And those who said, we want a nation, a land. And I think that there is a psychological factor to Jewish people basically saying you have to give to Israel, you have to be part of Israel, you have to, that's your nation.

That starts in the Zionist phase of the late, but it picks up after World War I. Late, what were you going to say, late? Well, late 1900s is the birth, right? But then it picks up after World War I, but not really. It becomes, remember, the Zionists made deals with Nazis.

The Zionists actually said Hitler was a good thing because they made a deal, various agreements, to start to move Jews because they wanted to take Palestine. at the time that Palestine was mostly Arab, right? So they knew they were a small population. They had to bring more Jews in from Europe.

And so I hate to say it, but the Holocaust, they used that Holocaust to basically say, we can now create a state. And that was obviously the energy that was given by Russia and America and all the UN countries to say, Israel can have a state.

Well, I think there's a couple of factors. As I mentioned, financial. I think you do have a lot of Jewish banking. We know that. That's historical. They're deeply tied into the banking system, including to the Federal Reserve. I mean, you look at even in Europe, the Rothschilds were the ones that got the letter from Balfour.

I mean, the Rothschilds obviously are a very wealthy, influential family, right? And that's not the only one. There is the Warburgs and others that were very influential in building our Federal Reserve system here. So Schiff and all these families. So again, you're talking money, but you're also talking about a base. From a strategic perspective, I think that the U.S.