Senator Eric Schmitt

It would be for promotion and a production of, for, for them to be able to go out and show their base, their fighting and stir up stuff. If it was actually a meeting of, of, of substance, we would maybe up for it. Uh, but I, we're going to work around that. And so out of all 53 senators, uh, Even the three that voted against them, they are not saying anything.

It would be for promotion and a production of, for, for them to be able to go out and show their base, their fighting and stir up stuff. If it was actually a meeting of, of, of substance, we would maybe up for it. Uh, but I, we're going to work around that. And so out of all 53 senators, uh, Even the three that voted against them, they are not saying anything.

It's just one individual on the committee that I feel like we can we can work out some differences of. And we've talked to multiple times. So I feel very strong. We're standing with Pete.

It's just one individual on the committee that I feel like we can we can work out some differences of. And we've talked to multiple times. So I feel very strong. We're standing with Pete.

Well, because I know what he's said many times in court, and that's the proper forum for debating this.

Well, because I know what he's said many times in court, and that's the proper forum for debating this.

It's not just a non-American. He entered the country illegally. He was, two judges had already said and already suggested that he should be deported. He had a rap sheet since he's been inside the United States. Keep in mind, his first time to have contact with the police, he had a wad of cash, he had baggies of drugs, and he had cash that had the symbol, hear no evil, see no evil,

It's not just a non-American. He entered the country illegally. He was, two judges had already said and already suggested that he should be deported. He had a rap sheet since he's been inside the United States. Keep in mind, his first time to have contact with the police, he had a wad of cash, he had baggies of drugs, and he had cash that had the symbol, hear no evil, see no evil,

Speak No Evil, which is a direct coalition to MS-13. So he had ties to them. And so there's no question about it. But here you have Senator Van Hollen, who spent taxpayer dollars to fly down to meet with an illegal alien. that entered the country illegally, that had broke the law since he'd been here, that had ties to an organization. And it's not just us. The court had said this too.

Speak No Evil, which is a direct coalition to MS-13. So he had ties to them. And so there's no question about it. But here you have Senator Van Hollen, who spent taxpayer dollars to fly down to meet with an illegal alien. that entered the country illegally, that had broke the law since he'd been here, that had ties to an organization. And it's not just us. The court had said this too.

He can deny it all he wants, but most criminals deny their crimes anyways. So for Van Hollen not to look him in the eye and ask a question tells you all you need to know about this organization. radical Democrat party, they don't care. It's not about what's doing right. It's about a message piece. It's about getting promotion. It's about seeing what they can do to have 15 minutes of fame.

He can deny it all he wants, but most criminals deny their crimes anyways. So for Van Hollen not to look him in the eye and ask a question tells you all you need to know about this organization. radical Democrat party, they don't care. It's not about what's doing right. It's about a message piece. It's about getting promotion. It's about seeing what they can do to have 15 minutes of fame.

And that's all that Senator Van Hollen did here. He wasn't trying to solve a problem. He saw an opportunity that he felt like he could get on national TV for. And guess what? He has. But his constituents should see that he's not fighting for the rule of law. He's fighting for himself so he doesn't get caught up in this same situation that Chuck Schumer's caught up in and could cost him his office.

And that's all that Senator Van Hollen did here. He wasn't trying to solve a problem. He saw an opportunity that he felt like he could get on national TV for. And guess what? He has. But his constituents should see that he's not fighting for the rule of law. He's fighting for himself so he doesn't get caught up in this same situation that Chuck Schumer's caught up in and could cost him his office.

You don't have Democrats that are serving for the good of the American people. You have Democrats that are self-serving themselves, and that's what's happening inside the Democrat Party right now.

You don't have Democrats that are serving for the good of the American people. You have Democrats that are self-serving themselves, and that's what's happening inside the Democrat Party right now.

So real quick, we're ironing out the details on tax permit law versus permanent policy or current policy. We'll get into that. We are very optimistic. We feel like our timeline, it's not set in stone, but our timeline, we would love to be able to deliver this to the president's desk before Memorial weekend.

So real quick, we're ironing out the details on tax permit law versus permanent policy or current policy. We'll get into that. We are very optimistic. We feel like our timeline, it's not set in stone, but our timeline, we would love to be able to deliver this to the president's desk before Memorial weekend.

Now I will tell you that's a tall order because there's details that we can get into on some real differences between the house and the Senate and why current policy versus current law and tax policy matters. It plays a huge pivotal point in this.

Now I will tell you that's a tall order because there's details that we can get into on some real differences between the house and the Senate and why current policy versus current law and tax policy matters. It plays a huge pivotal point in this.