Shaun Kent
speaker
1,202 appearances
7 recordings
1 series
first heard Mar 2025
last heard 17 Aug
Shaun Kent’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 5 in all, peaking in Mar 2026 with 2.
Appearances
Drugs in the baby, GHB in the baby oil, it's in the baby oil, it's in the baby oil, it's in the baby oil. And maybe that's just the question. It's like, you know what? Let's just knock this out in case there's any person on that jury who's thinking otherwise.
I love that you're so interested in the criminal justice system. It makes me so happy because it is confusing. But once you start to understand it, like it's very clear you're starting to understand it. And it's like putting a piece of a puzzle together that you now see why they're crossing the way they are and why they're asking the direct questions.
She could absolutely sit for a deposition. I think this is going to be a situation where this case doesn't go very far. Why? Because as Cheyenne just mentioned, this is a long time ago. This is a civil case. The statute of limitations, if I'm not mistaken, is six years on these types of situations.
I think he tried to file suit against Diddy, if I read correctly, at least two different times for the same action. They were both thrown out based upon it was outside the statute of limitations. I think the same thing is going to happen on this situation because I don't do good math, but that's well outside the six-year window in which this case is being brought.
And so they're being creative and trying to bring it outside the statute now.
That's why they're getting creative. We don't want someone to bring a lawsuit 10 and 20 years outside the scope. The biggest reason is people die, memories are fallible, evidence is lost. And so we want lawsuits to be brought as close or contemporaneous to the action as humanly possible. But the standard that they're relying upon is the new or should have known standard.
And so what they're saying is we would not have known about this lawsuit until now. So the statute of limitations could not have run. The problem that they're missing is what I just said, new or should have known. So I guarantee the response will be through due diligence and a tad bit of investigation.
They should have been able to find out way back in the day that his mom possibly had something to do with it. When we bring lawsuits in any time, and this is a great lesson, Anytime you've read a lawsuit, if you've noticed that there's like 60 people listed, you're like, why are they listing all of these people in the lawsuits? This is exactly why.
So we don't run the risk of missing somebody and then later having to bring a lawsuit 10 days down the road.
You've got corroboration, you've got corroboration of conduct. A lot of these lawsuits, I think, well, there's no doubt we're going to stop seeing these lawsuits. The filings are officially stopped. The Gender Motivated Violence Act had a timeline on it, which hit, I think, Sean, correct me if I'm wrong, February 28th. And so that's why you saw these last filings come through.
So they're officially done. But yeah, you have her words, you have corroboration. I don't want to call it a valid lawsuit, but you have an appropriate filed lawsuit from the victim's point of view. The problem is, if you watch... I don't want to say the wrong way, but the social media push. And I think I talked about this the first time we ever got on here.
When you have or you have one bad lawsuit or you have one situation, if you look like the Jay-Z, Busby situation, it affects everybody else's lawsuits. So now everybody is now looking at these new finds of lawsuits with a little bit of is this a good one or is not a good one? New York passed a statute, a Gender Motivated Violence Act.
So basically the purpose of this statute is, and keep it as simple as possible, that if you can allege that something happened on you based upon your gender, it's kind of not hilarious when you think about it because... Men and women are bringing actions against each other under the statute. So the gender doesn't really need to be there.
But if you make an allegation that somebody attacked you, harassed you, did something on you based upon your gender, the purpose of this statute was to open. And so we're talking about it now, the statute of limitations and say, we're giving you guys a window. We're giving you a small and I think it was a two-year window that you can bring claims from whenever. Bring them back.
Because what would end up happening is real victims, if you're really victimized, sometimes you're just like, I can't bring this lawsuit right now. I don't want to talk about it. In a Diddy situation, I'm scared for retaliation. He can come get me. So we had this window that it doesn't matter how long ago it was, you can bring the claim within a specific window. And it was two years.
That window ended on Friday.
I think it already has. It's already affecting because it is making it seem like some of these cases doesn't have merit, that he's not looking into his cases, whether it's true or not. It's affecting that. And no, there's no evidence whatsoever this was a settlement. Zero. Less than zero.
Yeah, it's crazy. And it's actually the judge's analysis is really good. They filed him for two things. They filed him for extortion and they filed for defamation. The judge said this ain't extortion. Lawyers have a right to send a demand letter as much as they possibly want. Move on with that.
As far, though, as and last week we talked about lawyers have qualified immunity or immunity to bring lawsuits. The judge says you have to prove actual malice that Busby acted with actual malice in the filing of this lawsuit. And he says, look. Just failure to investigate a case might be bad lawyering, but it's not actual malice to the point that I can bring a case.
Yes and no. So what ends up happening is we send letters. I'm going to call them letters. We'll send letters out to prospective jurors. They'll send a bunch of letters out to prospective jurors. The difference between our federal system and our state system, usually in the state system, anybody with a driver's license can get on a jury.
Showing 1161–1180 of 1,202 · page 59 of 61
← Previous
Next →