Stan Van Gundy

Number one, we should be paying the people who people are paying to see and watch on TV.

Nobody's turning on a game.

And I don't mean this as a knock, and I'm just throwing a name out there.

Nobody's turning on that Denver-San Antonio game the other night and saying, man, I can't wait to watch Cam Johnson.

They're turning on that game because it's Wimbinyama and Jokic.

So why shouldn't they make the money?

That's like saying, and now I'm making myself old here, but the example I've used is saying, yep, there's a limit on what Gladys Knight can make because we want more of the money to go to the pips.

Like, no, that's not the way it works.

We don't limit Bruce Springsteen's money so more goes to the E Street band.

Like, pay the stars, spread them out around the league.

This is my solution.

But the big one is get rid of the draft.

What possible?

No other plan gets rid of the incentive to lose.

It may decrease it a little, but it doesn't get rid of it.

You get rid of the draft.

What's your incentive to lose?

I agree on that one.

That's too vague.

I mean, I love the idea of it, but...