Stephen Miller

Your questions about him from the court can only be directed to him.

Your questions about him from the court can only be directed to him.

Your questions about him from the court can only be directed to him.

The Supreme Court said exactly what Marco said, that no court has the authority to compel the foreign policy function of the United States. We want a case 9-0, and people like CNN are portraying it as a loss, as usual, because they want foreign terrorists in the country who kidnap women and children.

The Supreme Court said exactly what Marco said, that no court has the authority to compel the foreign policy function of the United States. We want a case 9-0, and people like CNN are portraying it as a loss, as usual, because they want foreign terrorists in the country who kidnap women and children.

The Supreme Court said exactly what Marco said, that no court has the authority to compel the foreign policy function of the United States. We want a case 9-0, and people like CNN are portraying it as a loss, as usual, because they want foreign terrorists in the country who kidnap women and children.

Two immigration courts found that he was a member of MS-13. When President Trump declared MS-13 to be a foreign terrorist organization. That meant that he was no longer eligible under federal law, that he was no longer eligible for any form of immigration relief in the United States.

Two immigration courts found that he was a member of MS-13. When President Trump declared MS-13 to be a foreign terrorist organization. That meant that he was no longer eligible under federal law, that he was no longer eligible for any form of immigration relief in the United States.

So we had a deportation order that was valid, which meant that under our law, he's not even allowed to be present in the United States. and had to be returned because of the foreign terrorist designation.

So we had a deportation order that was valid, which meant that under our law, he's not even allowed to be present in the United States. and had to be returned because of the foreign terrorist designation.

And the Supreme Court said the district court order was unlawful and its main components were reversed 9-0 unanimously, stating clearly that neither Secretary of State nor the President could be compelled by anybody to forcibly retrieve a citizen of El Salvador from El Salvador, who again is a member of MS-13,

And the Supreme Court said the district court order was unlawful and its main components were reversed 9-0 unanimously, stating clearly that neither Secretary of State nor the President could be compelled by anybody to forcibly retrieve a citizen of El Salvador from El Salvador, who again is a member of MS-13,

I promise you, if he was your neighbor, you would move right away. So you don't plan to ask for it until we get it back? Was the ruling in the Supreme Court, Steve, was it 9-0? Yes, it was a 9-0 in our favor against the district court ruling, saying that no district court has the power to compel the foreign policy function of the United States.

I promise you, if he was your neighbor, you would move right away. So you don't plan to ask for it until we get it back? Was the ruling in the Supreme Court, Steve, was it 9-0? Yes, it was a 9-0 in our favor against the district court ruling, saying that no district court has the power to compel the foreign policy function of the United States.

I promise you, if he was your neighbor, you would move right away. So you don't plan to ask for it until we get it back? Was the ruling in the Supreme Court, Steve, was it 9-0? Yes, it was a 9-0 in our favor against the district court ruling, saying that no district court has the power to compel the foreign policy function of the United States.

As Pam said, the ruling solely stated that if this individual, at El Salvador's sole discretion, was sent back to our country, that we could deport him a second time. No version of this legally ends up with him ever living here, because he is a citizen of El Salvador. That is the president of El Salvador. Your questions about it, per the court, can only be directed to him.

As Pam said, the ruling solely stated that if this individual, at El Salvador's sole discretion, was sent back to our country, that we could deport him a second time. No version of this legally ends up with him ever living here, because he is a citizen of El Salvador. That is the president of El Salvador. Your questions about it, per the court, can only be directed to him.

As Pam said, the ruling solely stated that if this individual, at El Salvador's sole discretion, was sent back to our country, that we could deport him a second time. No version of this legally ends up with him ever living here, because he is a citizen of El Salvador. That is the president of El Salvador. Your questions about it, per the court, can only be directed to him.

That is the president of El Salvador. Your questions about it per the court can only be directed to him.

That is the president of El Salvador. Your questions about it per the court can only be directed to him.