Susan Crabtree

a deep conflict of interest there. And we know now what Jill Biden is capable of in terms of protecting and covering up the cognitive problems with her husband. So it raises a lot of questions in my mind. Yes. And there is, I just seriously doubt that there is no surveillance footage of where this was found. That I want to stress completely because I believe that it exists.

a deep conflict of interest there. And we know now what Jill Biden is capable of in terms of protecting and covering up the cognitive problems with her husband. So it raises a lot of questions in my mind. Yes. And there is, I just seriously doubt that there is no surveillance footage of where this was found. That I want to stress completely because I believe that it exists.

a deep conflict of interest there. And we know now what Jill Biden is capable of in terms of protecting and covering up the cognitive problems with her husband. So it raises a lot of questions in my mind. Yes. And there is, I just seriously doubt that there is no surveillance footage of where this was found. That I want to stress completely because I believe that it exists.

So if it exists, why are they telling time and time again on public statements that there was no camera surveillance? I don't think that makes sense. And if there was no camera surveillance, that is a security problem in and of itself. So Kimberly Cheadle, there was this conflict that Kimberly Cheadle wanted this, the cocaine disposed of, destroyed.

So if it exists, why are they telling time and time again on public statements that there was no camera surveillance? I don't think that makes sense. And if there was no camera surveillance, that is a security problem in and of itself. So Kimberly Cheadle, there was this conflict that Kimberly Cheadle wanted this, the cocaine disposed of, destroyed.

So if it exists, why are they telling time and time again on public statements that there was no camera surveillance? I don't think that makes sense. And if there was no camera surveillance, that is a security problem in and of itself. So Kimberly Cheadle, there was this conflict that Kimberly Cheadle wanted this, the cocaine disposed of, destroyed.

And we do see from the documents that it looks like it was destroyed in around July 13th. But my question is, supposedly the forensic division chief and the uniform division chief were pushing back on that saying, we have to hold this. There's a rule inside the Secret Service for five to seven years. Now, I'm being told by other sources, oh, well, narcotics, we dispose of them.

And we do see from the documents that it looks like it was destroyed in around July 13th. But my question is, supposedly the forensic division chief and the uniform division chief were pushing back on that saying, we have to hold this. There's a rule inside the Secret Service for five to seven years. Now, I'm being told by other sources, oh, well, narcotics, we dispose of them.

And we do see from the documents that it looks like it was destroyed in around July 13th. But my question is, supposedly the forensic division chief and the uniform division chief were pushing back on that saying, we have to hold this. There's a rule inside the Secret Service for five to seven years. Now, I'm being told by other sources, oh, well, narcotics, we dispose of them.

But what about the baggie that contains the narcotics? Does that include it in that narcotics disposal? Because there are also tubes in an envelope, a separate piece of evidence that has been preserved. Those tubes carry DNA, the DNA that supposedly the FBI found on the baggie.

But what about the baggie that contains the narcotics? Does that include it in that narcotics disposal? Because there are also tubes in an envelope, a separate piece of evidence that has been preserved. Those tubes carry DNA, the DNA that supposedly the FBI found on the baggie.

But what about the baggie that contains the narcotics? Does that include it in that narcotics disposal? Because there are also tubes in an envelope, a separate piece of evidence that has been preserved. Those tubes carry DNA, the DNA that supposedly the FBI found on the baggie.

So they are saying at the time back when they issued public statements and closed the investigation very quickly within 10, 11 days that there was insufficient DNA to get a match to run it by their criminal database at the FBI or the Secret Service. I am highly suspect of that statement. The FBI at the time, you know, was corrupted.

So they are saying at the time back when they issued public statements and closed the investigation very quickly within 10, 11 days that there was insufficient DNA to get a match to run it by their criminal database at the FBI or the Secret Service. I am highly suspect of that statement. The FBI at the time, you know, was corrupted.

So they are saying at the time back when they issued public statements and closed the investigation very quickly within 10, 11 days that there was insufficient DNA to get a match to run it by their criminal database at the FBI or the Secret Service. I am highly suspect of that statement. The FBI at the time, you know, was corrupted.

Can we trust that the FBI wasn't involved in the cover-up and couldn't find the DNA? That's an open question in my mind. And Dan Bangino can go back and look at that and go interview the people that made that statement. I'm told there's a document out there saying there was insufficient FBI, and that's what the Secret Service used to make that determination.

Can we trust that the FBI wasn't involved in the cover-up and couldn't find the DNA? That's an open question in my mind. And Dan Bangino can go back and look at that and go interview the people that made that statement. I'm told there's a document out there saying there was insufficient FBI, and that's what the Secret Service used to make that determination.

Can we trust that the FBI wasn't involved in the cover-up and couldn't find the DNA? That's an open question in my mind. And Dan Bangino can go back and look at that and go interview the people that made that statement. I'm told there's a document out there saying there was insufficient FBI, and that's what the Secret Service used to make that determination.

I'm also told that there was a partial DNA hit on this baggie but they decided that they didn't want to run it against the people that they had the partial dna hit and that's that's a forensic term that can mean a number of different things but it can mean that they did find a blood relative that when they ran it against a criminal database that contains dna samples from

I'm also told that there was a partial DNA hit on this baggie but they decided that they didn't want to run it against the people that they had the partial dna hit and that's that's a forensic term that can mean a number of different things but it can mean that they did find a blood relative that when they ran it against a criminal database that contains dna samples from