Thomas Massey

some of the files that i wanted to look at unredacted because i believe they implicate co-conspirators with jeffrey epstein haven't been put back up onto the public site nor the private site so i can't go look at documents unredacted that may contain the names of co-conspirators until they put those files what was justification for protecting co-conspirators

Well, they said they're protecting victims, okay?

But if you're protecting victims, and so you had to take the document down, then what you do is you redact all the information that would hurt the victim, and then you put it back up.

But they haven't put it back up, so I haven't been able to look at that.

Then there are files over there, the DOJ claims were redacted before they came into their possession.

And so when I try to unredact them, I can't see beyond the redactions.

And the DOJ says, sorry, that's just the way we received them.

Well, the fact of the matter is they need to go back to the U.S.

attorneys and the FBI that gave them those redacted documents and say, give us the unredacted documents.

But they haven't done that yet.

And then there's another category of files that are missing.

In talking to the survivor's lawyers...

The survivors have indicated that there's no evidence of their testimony in these files.

Like, they know it exists.

They sat down with the FBI.

They did an interview, and the FBI agents are obligated to summarize that interview, at least provide a summary in a 302 form.

Well, they can't even find their own 302 forms in the release of information.

So we know not everything has been released.

And I also know they're releasing more stuff, just quietly doing it.

Because when I go over there and look for things and find that they've redacted a man's name who may be a co-conspirator and threatened on the internet that they've done this, then they have released files.