Thomas Massey

I think he's a busy guy.

And I think he's not paying attention to this, although I will caution listeners that when I went to the Supreme Court, it was very much like the debate that I had in Congress on FISA.

There were actually three attorneys, not two.

Usually in the Supreme Court, there are attorneys arguing the plaintiff's side and the defendant's side.

In this case,

The U.S.

DOJ joined the German company Bayer, Bayer Monsanto, who makes glyphosate, in arguments.

So the DOJ helped a German company make the point that they should be immune from any state liability.

It's because we've got corporate capture of the EPA.

And so the EPA was set up ostensibly to protect people and the environment.

But now they've morphed into an organization that would give immunity.

They would give get out of court free cards to any company that could convince them to put a light label on it that says, you know, a warning label instead of a danger label.

Lee Zeldin right now.

And he was for that?

This case predates him, but it's going on right now under him.

And you might think the EPA, the federal EPA is going to argue for as much authority as they can get.

And the corporations would love to have one-stop shopping.

They don't want to be subject to courtrooms in 50 different states.

They want to be able to say, well, we got to get out a court-free card because the EPA said we don't need to put a skull and crossbones on this product.

All we need is a little warning label on it.