Tim Maudlin

speaker
4,767 appearances 2 recordings 1 series first heard Jul 2026 last heard 31 Aug

Tim Maudlin’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months
1 · Aug OctJan 26AprJulnow

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 2 in all, peaking in Aug 2026 with 1.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment
And whatever that is, that's not represented in the wave function, because the wave function doesn't tell you that.
The wave function only gives you this probabilistic prediction.
So then we can conclude the wave function is incomplete.
Same EPR argument runs perfectly.
Okay.
And
You would say if you want it to be a local theory, no spooky action at a distance, again, just as with EPR, it must be a deterministic theory.
The the two particles must have had their
Either they're
tendency to do up, down, or their tendency to do down, up from the beginning.
All Alice does is reveal a fact that was already there.
Once that fact is revealed to her, she can then update in a usual Bayesian manner on that information and say, ah, now not only do I know something about my particle, I know something about Bob's particle, right?
Bob's particle is the other the other one.
It's like the dollar bills.
that that you tear in half.
Um so you can again run exactly the EPR argument.
If there's no spooky action at a distance, the wave, the the singlet state is not a complete description.
In a complete description, you would have to it would have to be deterministic and the complete description would tell you exactly which way each particle was going to go.
Now
You might have noticed and you might have wondered, it might occur to you to wonder, if I go back for a second to the singlet state.
Showing 601–620 of 4,767 · page 31 of 239 ← Previous Next →