Tom Homan

The same message I've used since January 20th with sanctuary jurisdictions and politicians. I've been saying a thousand times, you cannot support us. Shame on you. You can support sanctuary cities. Shame on you. Sanctuary cities, you can step back and watch us do your job, make your community safer and not assist us with criminals, public safety threats in your community.

The same message I've used since January 20th with sanctuary jurisdictions and politicians. I've been saying a thousand times, you cannot support us. Shame on you. You can support sanctuary cities. Shame on you. Sanctuary cities, you can step back and watch us do your job, make your community safer and not assist us with criminals, public safety threats in your community.

But don't cross that line. I've used the term don't cross that line since January 20th. If you cross that line of impeding our enforcement efforts, that's a felony. If you cross that line unknowingly and harboring or concealing an illegal alien from ICE, that's a felony. You can't criminal trespass in our facilities. And you certainly... certainly can't put hands on an ICE officer.

But don't cross that line. I've used the term don't cross that line since January 20th. If you cross that line of impeding our enforcement efforts, that's a felony. If you cross that line unknowingly and harboring or concealing an illegal alien from ICE, that's a felony. You can't criminal trespass in our facilities. And you certainly... certainly can't put hands on an ICE officer.

And that's what she did. So she's being held accountable. Remember, we got two judges being prosecuted. We got a mayor that's arrested. We got a congresswoman. And look, they're not above the law either. They've been preaching four years. Trump wasn't above the law. Well, either are they. And we're going, I wasn't bluffing. We're going to hold people accountable.

And that's what she did. So she's being held accountable. Remember, we got two judges being prosecuted. We got a mayor that's arrested. We got a congresswoman. And look, they're not above the law either. They've been preaching four years. Trump wasn't above the law. Well, either are they. And we're going, I wasn't bluffing. We're going to hold people accountable.

You break the law, we're going to seek prosecution.

You break the law, we're going to seek prosecution.

Thank you for having me.

Thank you for having me.

Thanks. Good to be with you.

Thanks. Good to be with you.

Thanks. Good to be with you.

I agree with that. And Clarence Thomas had said during these hearings that the country got along just fine without nationwide injunctions until 1960. These are a relatively new phenomenon, and they've happened a lot more since Trump took office in 2016, 2017. And I think –

I agree with that. And Clarence Thomas had said during these hearings that the country got along just fine without nationwide injunctions until 1960. These are a relatively new phenomenon, and they've happened a lot more since Trump took office in 2016, 2017. And I think –

I agree with that. And Clarence Thomas had said during these hearings that the country got along just fine without nationwide injunctions until 1960. These are a relatively new phenomenon, and they've happened a lot more since Trump took office in 2016, 2017. And I think –

Some of the numbers on that is I think something like 75% of the national injunctions have been against Donald Trump just in the last 10 years. So this is a problem that has cropped up recently that is now being dealt with, and I agree with you. I think the way this has gone so far, it looks decent for Trump, but it probably is going to be pretty close.

Some of the numbers on that is I think something like 75% of the national injunctions have been against Donald Trump just in the last 10 years. So this is a problem that has cropped up recently that is now being dealt with, and I agree with you. I think the way this has gone so far, it looks decent for Trump, but it probably is going to be pretty close.

Some of the numbers on that is I think something like 75% of the national injunctions have been against Donald Trump just in the last 10 years. So this is a problem that has cropped up recently that is now being dealt with, and I agree with you. I think the way this has gone so far, it looks decent for Trump, but it probably is going to be pretty close.

General, when were the first universal injunctions used?