Trooper Yuri Bukenik
speaker
156 appearances
1 recordings
1 series
first heard Nov 2024
last heard Nov 2024
Trooper Yuri Bukenik’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
And Colin, correct?
Meaning you told First Assistant Bieland that you didn't know, didn't have relationships with members of the Albert and McCabe families. Answer, correct. Was that ambiguous in your mind?
Well, that might have been a good time to pipe up and say, well, I know Chris and I know Julie and I know Colin. Correct. That might have been a good time to answer the question. I know these three individuals from the Albert family. Right. But your answer was one word. Correct. Right. Yes.
You further testify that you never have gone to any supervisor at Massachusetts State Police to disclose even a potential conflict of interest in this case that you might have, correct? Correct. And you indicated the needs never come up. Is that right?
You also told ADA Lally that you, quote, did not have relationships or know members of the Albert or McCabe families. Correct? Correct. And that's just not true, is it? You did know. You do know members of the Albert family. Isn't that right?
But what about part of the question, did not have relationships or no members of the Albert or McCabe families? How about that part of the question?
I see. So what you did, Trooper Proctor, is you dissected the sentence. And where relationships are concerned, you ignored that in terms of the Alberts because you don't have relationships. Where no is concerned, you linked that to the McCabes because you don't know the McCabes. That's what you did?
How about if I just ask it this way? That was a lie, wasn't it?
You stand by that testimony? Yes. At the time that you testified that you didn't know the Alberts or any members of the Albert family?
My question is, you keep going back to relationships. I'm asking you, did you testify that you didn't know them?
So if you were to say, I don't know any members of the Albert family, that would have been a lie, correct? Correct.
You've already testified that there were several hundred Ring videos from One Meadows facing the driveway and the front door camera, correct?
As the case officer, you obtained and controlled those Ring videos from One Meadows from the moment that they came into Massachusetts State Police custody until they were handed over to the Commonwealth, correct?
You drafted the search warrant for the Ring video access records, correct?
You obtained the warrant returns once those search warrants were executed, correct?
You took possession of Mr. O'Keefe's cell phone physically, correct?
And you had access to Mr. O'Keefe's ring account in that cell phone. Is that right?
you indicated that you reviewed several of the videos on his Ring app on his cell phone. Is that right?
So you obviously had not only possession of the cell phone, you had possession of his login account information to get into the app on his cell phone. Is that right?
Which means somewhere or another, you could get access to the Ring videos.
Showing 81–100 of 156 · page 5 of 8
← Previous
Next →