Tyler Kendall
speaker
1,337 appearances
249 recordings
3 series
first heard Sep 2025
last heard 2 Sep
Tyler Kendall’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 248 in all, peaking in Aug 2026 with 61.
Appearances
Because this has never been done before.
This is typically a federal authority that is used to invoke sanctions.
So the question here is whether or not he circumvented
congress the other question was about whether or not he actually invoked a eatbook correctly if he's able to by declaring these national emergencies did those national emergencies related to fentanyl related to uh these trade imbalances reach a legal standard of what is known as an unusual and extraordinary threat that the president would have this authority to impose a tariff a import uh
A regulation of commerce in this way to achieve his objections, his objectives.
We're still reading through this, but it appears that we have one at least dissenting opinion was from Kavanaugh, of course, a justice, Brett Kavanaugh.
Kavanaugh, who was appointed under nominated under President Trump, who says, quote, The court says nothing today about whether and if so, how the government should go about returning the billions of dollars that it has collected from importers.
But that process is likely to be a mess, as was acknowledged at oral argument.
So that's going to be the entire next phase of this.
Well, if you want to hear a pretty startling statistic, IEPA tariffs have been collected for more than $301,000.
thousand importers.
And every company that wants a refund would need a distinct claim in court.
Perhaps we'll likely see a class action lawsuit that could maybe put this a little bit more broad-based.
But when we're looking at just the massive amount of revenue that was raised by these IEPA tariffs alone, of course the Trump administration has
other tariff authorities that are already in place, Section 232 related to national security, for example.
Those IEPA broad-based tariffs brought in last year more than $134 billion for the U.S.
government.
So it's going to be a complicated process.
It likely would leave the question of refunds to a lower court, most likely the Court of International Trade, which first took up
uh this case there's a few different wonky points that i had written down here on how this could ultimately end up happening one thing to know is that there's something known as the liquidation process which basically is the statute of limitation that a company can ask for its money back that's 314 days so some of those tariffs imposed on china have actually been uh imposed longer than that so those companies wouldn't get those back but by and large i think we're still within
Showing 1041–1060 of 1,337 · page 53 of 67
← Previous
Next →