Vanessa Grigoriadis

that they were going to focus on this one aspect of the case, that there was no collision.

Now, the issue people have with this case is that they believe that in order for John O'Keefe to have been killed in the house or the garage or something, that there had to have been this huge conspiracy involving lots of people who were lying in order to keep this whole thing a secret.

And that is simply not true.

We are talking about five people with a hell of a lot to lose.

who would have been lying.

And we're talking about a cop who walked into it with a story and then very likely put his finger on the scales to make his story the right story.

And I believe that this is the kind of cop that he was.

So I'll give you a very specific example of this.

Michael Proctor is the name of this police officer.

He ended up becoming this very polarizing figure in the case.

Karen Reed's car was impounded by the police.

Her car was parked at her parents' house in Dighton, Massachusetts, okay?

Michael Proctor wrote the time of that taking of the car an hour later than he actually took it.

And he repeated that wrong time over and over and over and over again.

The Reeds have a ring camera and they were able to document the time that he took the car.

If he took it at the later time, then he would have had the car after the first piece of taillight was found in the Albert's yard.

There is a reason why there could have been an altercation in the house.

There is a dog that's known to not be good with people.

And anybody who has an aggressive dog knows they are very likely to attack somebody that they perceive is in conflict with their owner.

And it is not unlikely that they would have kept Chloe in the garage when they had a bunch of people at their house, which they did.