Victoria Burke

speaker

114 appearances 1 recordings 1 series first heard Jun 2026 last heard 2 Jun

Victoria Burke’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 1 in all, peaking in Jun 2026 with 1.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment

The Megyn Kelly Show · Blake Lively's Legal Fees Ploy, and Mackenzie Shirilla's Shocking "Crash," with MK True Crime's Phil Holloway, Ashleigh Merchant, and Dave Aronberg | Ep. 1330 · 2 Jun 2026 podcast

So that would be.

But my understanding, if he dismissed it under one completely and chose not to discuss it because Judge Leibniz chose not to discuss it.

Number two, he did not say I'm dismissing it for three reasons.

He said I'm dismissing it for one.

So I thought we're one and done then.

But then here we are.

Well, I have a bit of a concern that this bill is really meant to protect survivors who are having meritless cases brought against them when they don't have money to defend themselves.

And it was supposed to make

someone discouraged from bringing forward a meritless suit.

And I do worry about my bill being misused and for, you know, just for PR and what it could be gained from that when it really matters so much to survivors to be able to have these protections that so many of her claims are dismissed.

I'm just, I might've lost her words.

You nailed it, Megan, about the concern for most survivors is that these can be these.

A lot of times they're weaponized defamation lawsuits used to silence them because when someone receives it, they realize it might take five, six or seven figures to defend in multiple years, and it's always cheaper to go quiet.

So the concern was, if you have to go forward and defend it and you prevail,

then only if you prevail to show that you did not have malice, you would recover your attorney fees.

So at least you'd be made whole in any damages that you might have, like missing work or something to that effect.

And also the purpose that I believed in was to incentivize attorneys to take these very difficult cases.

And, you know, so that's been my main concern with the bill.

For 47.1, it would not be.

You would have to show malice in order to receive any attorney fees.

Showing 81–100 of 114 · page 5 of 6