Vince Chan

Figure out your own psychological state of mind when something exciting happened or something bad happened.

Figure out your own psychological state of mind when something exciting happened or something bad happened.

Now, but that's one area or in particular one paper that interests me when I did my research for this interview. This paper was published in year 2020. It's called Power and Decision Making.

Now, but that's one area or in particular one paper that interests me when I did my research for this interview. This paper was published in year 2020. It's called Power and Decision Making.

new directions for research in the age of artificial intelligence now that's 2020 that's before we have chat gpt and many other ai tools as of today so can you tell us a bit more about your argument for that paper back then

new directions for research in the age of artificial intelligence now that's 2020 that's before we have chat gpt and many other ai tools as of today so can you tell us a bit more about your argument for that paper back then

So are you carrying on with your original research back in 2020 and today with all the new development and still studying this? If you are, what's your status? What's your observation?

So are you carrying on with your original research back in 2020 and today with all the new development and still studying this? If you are, what's your status? What's your observation?

Now, let me share a bit about my user viewpoint. Yes, I use chat GPT sometimes. I don't have that conscious feelings of power when I use it. Do I see it as assistant? I see it as honestly as a colleague, so to speak. Although I found this colleague, a lot of times provides me with a huge degree of confirmation bias. Whatever I say, oh yeah, that's right. You can think of it this way and all that.

Now, let me share a bit about my user viewpoint. Yes, I use chat GPT sometimes. I don't have that conscious feelings of power when I use it. Do I see it as assistant? I see it as honestly as a colleague, so to speak. Although I found this colleague, a lot of times provides me with a huge degree of confirmation bias. Whatever I say, oh yeah, that's right. You can think of it this way and all that.

I'm very conscious about confirmation bias when I use CheckGPT. When I ask them questions, I try to get them to help me figure it out, or maybe write something more for me, give me more inspiration, creativity, and they keep coming back with the same idea. Eventually I said, that's not working.

I'm very conscious about confirmation bias when I use CheckGPT. When I ask them questions, I try to get them to help me figure it out, or maybe write something more for me, give me more inspiration, creativity, and they keep coming back with the same idea. Eventually I said, that's not working.

I would imagine if this is talking to a human colleague, I might be more careful in terms of the language I use. Am I saying any things that may upset you? But I still see it as a machine. And as of now, the emotional aspect of it is not so human yet. So that's why I don't see it just as an assistant. I would take it more like advisor, you know, depending on situation.

I would imagine if this is talking to a human colleague, I might be more careful in terms of the language I use. Am I saying any things that may upset you? But I still see it as a machine. And as of now, the emotional aspect of it is not so human yet. So that's why I don't see it just as an assistant. I would take it more like advisor, you know, depending on situation.

Well, if I structure the questions, I must say they give me some ideas as if I'm talking to a fairly intelligent person. And then we keep communicating. Then this kind of interaction or conversation sometimes, honestly, is more interesting. than talking to a human who may not have any sense of independent thinking.

Well, if I structure the questions, I must say they give me some ideas as if I'm talking to a fairly intelligent person. And then we keep communicating. Then this kind of interaction or conversation sometimes, honestly, is more interesting. than talking to a human who may not have any sense of independent thinking.

I do see the value in terms of using the machine, a highly intelligent machine, and me as the human also being aware of what kind of biases that I may face if I use this tool. Just be aware of that, be mindful not to be distracted or get so carried away by that. So far, this conversation, this interaction for me is still manageable.

I do see the value in terms of using the machine, a highly intelligent machine, and me as the human also being aware of what kind of biases that I may face if I use this tool. Just be aware of that, be mindful not to be distracted or get so carried away by that. So far, this conversation, this interaction for me is still manageable.

But then I watched a video posted by an adjunct professor of entrepreneurship from Chicago Bull. The topic is why AI may be your best astrologist. I know you work with and teach a lot of MBAs, executives. Do you see us, like people like us, decision-making, executive decision-making, perhaps AI could be one of our best astrologists?

But then I watched a video posted by an adjunct professor of entrepreneurship from Chicago Bull. The topic is why AI may be your best astrologist. I know you work with and teach a lot of MBAs, executives. Do you see us, like people like us, decision-making, executive decision-making, perhaps AI could be one of our best astrologists?