Viva Frei

Consecutive. But no, I think they get him on the easiest one. Right off the bat, the evidence is there. And I think it's not hard to show the coercion. Nobody wants to have a freak-off when they're having a urinary tract infection. She was physically beaten all they need to know. And if it happened once, it happened more than once.

Consecutive. But no, I think they get him on the easiest one. Right off the bat, the evidence is there. And I think it's not hard to show the coercion. Nobody wants to have a freak-off when they're having a urinary tract infection. She was physically beaten all they need to know. And if it happened once, it happened more than once.

Consecutive. But no, I think they get him on the easiest one. Right off the bat, the evidence is there. And I think it's not hard to show the coercion. Nobody wants to have a freak-off when they're having a urinary tract infection. She was physically beaten all they need to know. And if it happened once, it happened more than once.

To say that she freely did anything, I don't think any reasonable jury member's been involved.

To say that she freely did anything, I don't think any reasonable jury member's been involved.

To say that she freely did anything, I don't think any reasonable jury member's been involved.

To state the obvious, abject degeneracy. But set that aside. And again, Canadian lawyer never practiced criminal law, but we know the standard. Very smart man. Probative value needs to outweigh the prejudicial nature or the unduly prejudicial nature of the evidence.

To state the obvious, abject degeneracy. But set that aside. And again, Canadian lawyer never practiced criminal law, but we know the standard. Very smart man. Probative value needs to outweigh the prejudicial nature or the unduly prejudicial nature of the evidence.

To state the obvious, abject degeneracy. But set that aside. And again, Canadian lawyer never practiced criminal law, but we know the standard. Very smart man. Probative value needs to outweigh the prejudicial nature or the unduly prejudicial nature of the evidence.

One would argue what's unduly prejudicial about another woman explaining exactly what we already see on camera of him doing to Cassie. And I would also imagine maybe there's a way of subpoenaing the podcaster to have it admitted as evidence, not as the truthfulness of the statements made, but rather just that it happened. This is what she said, and you can take it at its face value or not.

One would argue what's unduly prejudicial about another woman explaining exactly what we already see on camera of him doing to Cassie. And I would also imagine maybe there's a way of subpoenaing the podcaster to have it admitted as evidence, not as the truthfulness of the statements made, but rather just that it happened. This is what she said, and you can take it at its face value or not.

One would argue what's unduly prejudicial about another woman explaining exactly what we already see on camera of him doing to Cassie. And I would also imagine maybe there's a way of subpoenaing the podcaster to have it admitted as evidence, not as the truthfulness of the statements made, but rather just that it happened. This is what she said, and you can take it at its face value or not.

But it's again, I would argue if you want to get this in as admissible hearsay and the argument is going to be, does the probative value outweigh the unduly prejudicial nature of it? It's on video. We know that this is his MO. It's part of his defense. He gets angry and violent when he gets jealous. OK. Maybe the defense will submit it as an exhibit because it supports their evidence.

But it's again, I would argue if you want to get this in as admissible hearsay and the argument is going to be, does the probative value outweigh the unduly prejudicial nature of it? It's on video. We know that this is his MO. It's part of his defense. He gets angry and violent when he gets jealous. OK. Maybe the defense will submit it as an exhibit because it supports their evidence.

But it's again, I would argue if you want to get this in as admissible hearsay and the argument is going to be, does the probative value outweigh the unduly prejudicial nature of it? It's on video. We know that this is his MO. It's part of his defense. He gets angry and violent when he gets jealous. OK. Maybe the defense will submit it as an exhibit because it supports their evidence.

He gets violent and angry when he gets jealous, but he's not a RICO sex trafficker. Good luck with that defense.

He gets violent and angry when he gets jealous, but he's not a RICO sex trafficker. Good luck with that defense.

He gets violent and angry when he gets jealous, but he's not a RICO sex trafficker. Good luck with that defense.

Stand by. Search history on the internet, looking up porn.

Stand by. Search history on the internet, looking up porn.