Wade
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Okay, for instance, 13 is a happy number because 1 squared plus 3 squared equals 10, and 1 squared plus 0 squared equals 1.
So if you eventually reduce it down through the sum of the squares... This really is the Jim Carrey movie.
You know, I really prefer melancholy numbers.
That's where when you replace them with the square root of each digit separately but added together, it stays the same number forever.
I think that mathematicians sometimes get this weird hard-on to, wow, our number system that we made is really so perfect and it's so circular and everything, oh, it lines up so beautifully, except for the things that don't.
What the fuck is perfect digital invariant?
These functions function of N. I don't fucking know.
d to the p under the to the lower i period d to the p to the lower i baby i'm perky and where k equals what is that symbol it's not a bracket it's a it's an l but in the shape of a bracket but it doesn't have a top topless bracket topless bracket
For example, the number 4150 in base B equals 10 is a perfect digital invariant of B equals 5 because 4150 equals 4 to the 5th.
Where's the introverted digital invariant?