Wendy Patrick

speaker

101 appearances 1 recordings 1 series first heard Jul 2026 last heard 10 Jul

Wendy Patrick’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 1 in all, peaking in Jul 2026 with 1.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment

Bannon`s War Room · Episode 5506: Evidence From The Stolen Election In Detroit · 10 Jul 2026 podcast

Up to that point, we had not heard anything attributed.

Correct.

No doubt.

That is one of the most frustrating things about listening to this tape.

And mind you, this is actually a redacted video.

And part of the redactions were done for the same goal you mentioned earlier.

Nobody wants to compromise the integrity of the conviction, especially not in a death penalty case where that may likely be the result as well.

So for whatever reason, there was a series of redactions, not as many as we originally thought we were going to see.

And that was good news for the Kirk family.

but enough to where there are still these lingering questions.

Now, that's not to say that by the time we get to trial, because you remember the redactions were to protect the jury pool from receiving information that might not be admissible at trial.

When we get to trial, Steve, we may very well have more evidence, more unredacted evidence as to what exactly Tyler Robinson said.

Well, that could be true, but Steve, I'm gonna answer based on 30 years of doing this.

You can do it if you select a jury the right way.

You know, change of venue motions don't matter in an age of social media.

You could move this case to the moon, Steve, and there'd be somebody that heard about it.

But even if you try it in the jurisdiction where it happened, voir dire jury selection is such an extended process with such deep questioning that you are, in most cases, able to get men and women that take this very seriously.

You're not going to find somebody that hasn't heard about the case, but that's not the litmus test.

It's can you put aside what you heard outside the courtroom, conspiracy theories included, and only judge the case based on the evidence in the courtroom?

And I have to tell you, jurors act as checks and balances on each other in the deliberation room when somebody begins to talk about something that shouldn't be relevant or be considered.

Showing 81–100 of 101 · page 5 of 6