Zach Wahls

Just saying.

Well, I don't even think Jim Comey really needs an attorney here.

I am fairly confident that this is going to get dismissed, but what do I know?

I just play a lawyer on TV and podcasts.

Dan, you will remember the last ill-fated attempt this administration made in criminally finding Jim Comey guilty of any crimes.

That was the indictment secured, and I put that in quotes, by unlawfully appointed prosecutor Lindsay Halligan, representing the Eastern District of Virginia.

The judge in that case concluded that

Halligan's indictment of Comey, which sought to find him guilty of lying to both Congress and this, I believe the Senate Judiciary Committee, the judge tossed that indictment out because Ms.

Halligan was unlawfully appointed to her post.

Therefore, all matters flowing from that appointment were equally unlawful.

It was clownish.

But I do think the term be clowned itself belongs in this indictment because it is so foolish and

as to make clowns look like serious people.

First of all, if you've read the indictment, it's so short, it's a page, and this is how it goes.

Just can I read a little excerpt of it?

On or about May 15th, 2025, in the Eastern District of North Carolina, James Brian Comey did knowingly and willfully make a threat to take the life of and to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States.

in that he publicly posted a photograph on the internet social media site Instagram, which depicted seashells arranged in a pattern making out 86, 47.

47 being the number of Trump's second presidency.

8647, which a reasonable recipient who is familiar with the circumstances would interpret as a serious expression of an intent to do harm to the President of the United States.

To which I say, prosecutors, would a reasonable recipient interpret a seashell message on the beach as a serious expression of an intent to do harm to the President of the United States?