There are few terms in the world of AI — if any — that invoke more of a reaction than a simple four-letter word: Open. Whether it’s industry debates over business models and the actual definition of open, or the US government actively discussing how to regulate open models, seemingly everyone has an opinion on what it means for AI models to be open. The good, the bad, and the ugly.But to be fair, there’s good reason for this. In a world where many developers have come to expect open source tools at every level of the stack, the idea of powerful models locked behind enterprise licenses and corporate ethics can be disconcerting — especially for a technology as game-changing as AI promises to be. It’s a matter of who has the ability to innovate in the space, and whose release schedules and guardrails they’re beholden to.This is why, back in February, a16z convened a panel of experts to discuss the state — and future — of open source AI models.Featuring:Jim Zemlin (Executive Director, Linux Foundation)Mitchell Baker (Executive Chair, Mozilla Corp.)Percy Liang (Associate Professor, Stanford; Cofounder, Together AI)Anjney Midha (General Partner, a16z)Derrick Harris (Editorial Partner, a16z) Check out everything a16z is doing with artificial intelligence here, including articles, projects, and more podcasts. Please note that the content here is for informational purposes only; should NOT be taken as legal, business, tax, or investment advice or be used to evaluate any investment or security; and is not directed at any investors or potential investors in any a16z fund. a16z and its affiliates may maintain investments in the companies discussed. For more details please see a16z.com/disclosures. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related