(Partially in response to AGI Ruin: A list of Lethalities. Written in the same rambling style. Not exhaustive.)Agreements Powerful AI systems have a good chance of deliberately and irreversibly disempowering humanity. This is a much easier failure mode than killing everyone with destructive physical technologies. Catastrophically risky AI systems could plausibly exist soon, and there likely won’t be a strong consensus about this fact until such systems pose a meaningful existential risk per year. There is not necessarily any “fire alarm.” Even if there were consensus about a risk from powerful AI systems, there is a good chance that the world would respond in a totally unproductive way. It’s wishful thinking to look at possible stories of doom and say “we wouldn’t let that happen;” humanity is fully capable of messing up even very basic challenges, especially if they are novel.Source:https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CoZhXrhpQxpy9xw9y/where-i-agree-and-disagree-with-eliezer---A podcast by BlueDot Impact.Learn more on the AI Safety Fundamentals website.
No persons identified in this episode.
This episode hasn't been transcribed yet
Help us prioritize this episode for transcription by upvoting it.
Popular episodes get transcribed faster
Other recent transcribed episodes
Transcribed and ready to explore now
3ª PARTE | 17 DIC 2025 | EL PARTIDAZO DE COPE
01 Jan 1970
El Partidazo de COPE
Buchladen: Tipps für Weihnachten
20 Dec 2025
eat.READ.sleep. Bücher für dich
BOJ alza 25pb decennale sopra 2%, Oracle vola con accordo Tik Tok, 90 mld eurobond per Ucraina | Morning Finance
19 Dec 2025
Black Box - La scatola nera della finanza
365. The BEST advice for managing ADHD in your 20s ft. Chris Wang
19 Dec 2025
The Psychology of your 20s
LVST 19 de diciembre de 2025
19 Dec 2025
La Venganza Será Terrible (oficial)
Cuando la Ciencia Ficción Explicó el Mundo que Hoy Vivimos
19 Dec 2025
El Podcast de Marc Vidal