Is the Moon a Hollow Spacecraft?

Warning: This episode almost ended in a lunar-sized argument! Travis and Josh lock horns over the wildly debated hollow moon theory. Could our closest celestial neighbor actually be an enormous artificial structure? The Hollow Moon Theory has captivated fringe scientists and conspiracy theorists for decades, and for compelling reasons. When NASA intentionally crashed lunar modules into the moon's surface during Apollo missions, something unexpected happened – the moon resonated for hours, "ringing like a bell" according to scientists monitoring the seismic activity. Even stranger, the vibrations appeared to accelerate rather than diminish with depth.Josh and Travis go head-to-head in this mind-bending episode, exploring scientific anomalies that mainstream explanations struggle to address. Why does the moon have such unusually low density compared to Earth? How do we explain finding elements on the lunar surface that supposedly don't occur naturally? And perhaps most perplexing: why are surface rocks on the moon consistently older than those beneath them – a geological impossibility according to conventional understanding?The debate gets heated as Josh embraces the possibility of an artificial moon, while Travis remains firmly skeptical, dissecting each claim with rational counterarguments. They explore ancient texts from various cultures describing times "before the moon existed," consider whether the moon's perfect positioning for solar eclipses could be intentional design, and question why humans haven’t returned to the moon since the 70's despite vastly improved technology.Whether you're a skeptic or open to alternative explanations, this episode challenges conventional thinking about one of our most familiar cosmic companions. Listen now and decide for yourself: is our moon simply a natural satellite, or could it be hiding secrets far beyond our current understanding?Text us something cool or fun!Support the show

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.