AJSM November 2014 Podcast: Arthroscopic Suprapectoral and Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis: A Comparison of Minimum Two Year Clinical Outcomes

episode

American Journal of Sports Medicine not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

The Ezra Klein Show: Jensen Huang Thinks A.I. Alarmism Has Gone Too Far 1h 50m · 25 Sep 2026 · Hard Fork

Pretty Little Episode #110 26 min · 25 Sep 2026 · Handsome

Be Upfront About How You Make Money From Your Podcast 2 min · 25 Sep 2026 · One Minute Podcast Tips - Be a Better Podcaster in Just 60 Seconds

High Stakes US-China Sit Down & Flock Surveillance Under Scrutiny | 9.25.26 19 min · 25 Sep 2026 · Morning Wire

Trump Spooked by Plane at Xi Meeting & Sen. Tuberville Rails Against Flying Furries | Merritt Wever 37 min · 25 Sep 2026 · The Daily Show: Ears Edition

Ireland collapse in Kosovo as Israel game looms 13 min · 25 Sep 2026 · Today with David McCullagh

Report any issue

Source

Recorded16 Oct 2014

Publishersageorthopaedics.libsyn.com ↗

Handlerec:913354

Show notes

While a vast body of literature exists describing biceps tenodesis techniques and evaluating the biomechanical aspects of tenodesis locations or various implants, little literature presents useful clinical outcomes to guide surgeons in their decision to perform a particular method of tenodesis. Both ASPBT and OSPBT yield excellent clinical and functional results for the management of isolated superior labrum or long head of the bicepslesions. No significant differences in clinical outcomes as determined by several validated outcome measures were found between the 2 tenodesis methods, nor were any significant range of motion or strength deficits noted at a minimum 2years postoperatively. Click here to read the article.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in