Peer Review: Should You Review This Submission?

episode

ASCPT Podcast Channel not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

#502 – Psychiatry, Insane Asylums, Mental Illness, ECT, Lobotomies, Freud & Jung 3h 43m · 17 Sep 2026 · Lex Fridman Podcast

Your partner wants profit. You want freedom. Now what? 22 min · 16 Sep 2026 · The Optometry Success Podcast

Board of County Supervisors Meeting - Work Session - Sep 15, 2026 3h 17m · 15 Sep 2026 · Prince William County Board of Supervisors

Finance and Budget Committee - Sep 15, 2026 1h 43m · 15 Sep 2026 · Prince William County Finance and Budget Committee

Sept. 15, 2026 Board of Supervisors Meeting 8h 46m · 15 Sep 2026 · Fairfax County Board of Supervisors

The Art of True Happiness | Dr. Arthur Brooks 2h 49m · 14 Sep 2026 · Huberman Lab

Report any issue

Source

Recorded27 Jul 2021

Publisherascptpod.com ↗

Handlerec:15195417

Show notes

Kicking off a six-part series on peer review, ClinPharmPod host Alaina Webster chats with Dr. Sarah Holstein, Associate Professor at the University of Nebraska Medical Center and Associate Editor for Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) about the importance of peer review in scientific research and what might constitute a conflict of interest for potential reviewers. You can access CPT’s Reviewer Instructions here.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in