Peer Review: What’s Not Helpful in a Review?

episode

ASCPT Podcast Channel not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

Your partner wants profit. You want freedom. Now what? 22 min · 16 Sep 2026 · The Optometry Success Podcast

Board of County Supervisors Meeting - Work Session - Sep 15, 2026 3h 17m · 15 Sep 2026 · Prince William County Board of Supervisors

Finance and Budget Committee - Sep 15, 2026 1h 43m · 15 Sep 2026 · Prince William County Finance and Budget Committee

The Art of True Happiness | Dr. Arthur Brooks 2h 49m · 14 Sep 2026 · Huberman Lab

The Chris Wolfe Podcast: The Power of Quality Supplements 48 min · 14 Sep 2026 · EyeCode Media

Brisbane coach Chris Fagan (14.09.26) 10 min · 13 Sep 2026 · SEN Breakfast

Report any issue

Source

Recorded14 Sep 2021

Publisherascptpod.com ↗

Handlerec:15195414

Show notes

ClinPharmPod’s peer review series continues as host Alaina Webster is chats with Dr. Richard Peck about what to avoid when completing a review. They cover what’s too little and what’s too much in a review, the appropriate tone to strike when providing feedback, and the tricky topic that is unconscious bias. You can access CPT’s Reviewer Instructions and contact the editorial office to volunteer as a reviewer here.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in