Peer Review: What’s the Best Way to Organize My Review?

episode

ASCPT Podcast Channel not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

Could sofa theory help you find your ideal partner? 4 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Do you really know?

Behind The Scenes At Vogue World Milano 28 min · 23 Sep 2026 · The Run-Through with Vogue

Is end-to-end encryption really secure? 4 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Do you really know?

Do tongue scrapers actually help with bad breath? 5 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Do you really know?

Lab Notes: Have we found dark matter? 10 min · 23 Sep 2026 · The Science Show

Is it cool to have no friends? 26 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Today in Focus

Report any issue

Source

Recorded20 Sep 2021

Publisherascptpod.com ↗

Handlerec:15195412

Show notes

Host Alaina Webster sits down with Dr. Jonathan French to discuss the best organizational practices for a review – both from an associated editor’s standpoint and from an author’s. Jonthan, an Associate Editor for CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, delves into why he appreciates reviews that are broken up into three sections as well as why ASCPT’s journals ask for comments to the editor as well as the reviewer. You can access PSP’s Reviewer Instructions and contact the editorial office to volunteer as a reviewer here.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in