Let's talk about Trump, nationalizing, and reading the Constitution....
episodeTranscript
jump: chapters · speakers · find in transcriptTranscript
Transcript generated automatically by AI and may contain errors.
What controversial statement did Trump make about nationalizing elections?
Well, howdy there, Internet people, it's Belle again. So today, we're going to talk about Trump nationalizing and reading the Constitution. Trump was on a podcast and said something ridiculous, and the media, in pursuit of ad revenue, treated a completely unserious and blatantly unconstitutional suggestion as something worthy of debate.
and therefore actually increase the likelihood of it happening. This is not actually up for debate. Trump said, The Republicans should say, We want to take over. We should take over the voting. The voting in at least many, 15 places.
The Republicans ought to nationalize the voting. So, this is being said after it became ridiculously apparent that Trump can't cancel the elections and that any attempt to do so would actually hurt the states that went along with it, which, by default, would be Republican states.
How does the Constitution regulate state elections?
So now that that plan is shot, Trump went on to the next one and really just showed he's either never read or doesn't understand the most basic aspects of the Constitution and that he doesn't believe his base is patriotic enough to have ever read the Constitution either. Article 1, Section 4. The time, places, and manner of holding elections for senators and representatives shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof. But the Congress may at any time, by law, make or alter such regulations, except as to the places of choosing senators. The Constitution grants power to the state to handle their own elections. It gives Congress a secondary role to alter regulations, not nationalize the elections in 15 states that hurt Trump's feelings.
In fact, beyond that, in Cook v. Grelike, 2001, the Supreme Court held that neither Congress nor the states can even attempt to dictate outcomes of elections. In the case, the state of Missouri just wanted to add a little notice to ballots saying a candidate didn't support term limits. Even that was held to be too much influence over the outcome. At this point, it's worth reminding people that to Trump, the Constitution isn't an ideal.
What is the independent state legislature theory and its implications?
It's an obstacle. It's something to be lied about and gotten around. Want proof? Remember the term independent state legislature theory? In 2020, Trump's team backed this idea, which gave 100% control of elections to the state legislature because at the time it was helpful to him. But now just a few years later, the federal government has all the power. It must be exhausting trying to support a man who doesn't have actual positions. Senate Majority Leader Republican John Thune immediately shot down the idea, saying he was in favor of ID at polling places, but quote, I'm not in favor of federalizing elections. No, I think that's a constitutional issue. I'm a big believer in decentralized and distributed power, and I think it's harder to hack 50 election systems than it is to hack one.
How do Republicans view Trump's proposals on election control?
In my view at least, that's always a system that has worked pretty well. That makes it pretty clear that Trump doesn't even have the votes to alter state regulations, much less attempt a constitutional amendment. It's bad when even Republicans are pointing out that Trump is trying to undermine election security. Look, you can't ignore this. But stop pretending like every outburst from Grandpa Trump is worthy of actual debate.
Why is debating Trump's ideas considered problematic?
When you debate it, you put it in the Overton window. No, he can't do this. Even Republicans know this. Supporting this is abandoning America. Anyway, it's just a thought. Y'all have a good day.
No segments match your search.
Select any passage to copy it with its citation or turn it into a shareable card.
Chapters
5 chapters
1
What controversial statement did Trump make about nationalizing elections?
0:01–1:11
2
How does the Constitution regulate state elections?
1:11–2:52
3
What is the independent state legislature theory and its implications?
2:52–3:59
4
How do Republicans view Trump's proposals on election control?
3:59–4:34
5
Why is debating Trump's ideas considered problematic?
4:34–4:51
Speakers
2 identifiedMore from Belle of the Ranch
Let's talk about Trump vs Smokey Bear....
Let's talk about Trump blocking the strait after failing to get a peace deal....
Let's talk about Trump’s record low consumer sentiment....
Let's talk about Trump, Iran, tolls in the strait of Hormuz, and what it all means....
Let's talk about Trump, Madman theory, and the search for reason....
Let's talk about more bad news for Trump’s midterms....