Nesse episódio, Dra. Ana Arantes (@anarantes_bcba) e Dra. Liliane Rocha (@thebehaviorweb) discutem as circumstâncias à cerca da renúncia de Amy Odum e Jonathan Tarbox de suas funções junto da ABAI. Deixamos claro que Ana e Liliane repudiam a postura da ABAI, e os convidamos a escrever uma carta à ABAI declarando o seu repúdio, visitando esse link: https://www.abainternational.org/contact-us.aspx ou mandando direto pra esse email: [email protected] Você pode usar o texto abaixo, se quiser se comunicar em inglês: Dear Members of the Executive Council at ABAI, As a fellow behavior analyst and member of the scientific and professional community represented by this association, I want to express my profound disagreement with the leniency shown in regards to individuals and institutions that use and promote aversive procedures of behavior modification. I want to show you my support of Dr. Amy Odum and Dr. Jonathan Tarbox in reinforcing that procedures like Contingent Skin Shock and institutions like Judge Rotenberg “Educational” Center do not represent the ethics and conduct of Behavior Analysis as a field, and that of its practitioners as service providers of humane, person-centered, evidence-based, and effective treatments. Sincerely, ________

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related