Ep.171 - Don't Fling Mud At The Scud Stud

episode

CANADALAND not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

The Songs of John Farnham: A Living Legend | Tony Cochrane (23.09.26) 7 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Whateley

Las 10 de Erazno, el Chokolatazo, Parodias, 1h 29m · 23 Sep 2026 · Erazno y La Chokolata El Podcast

Steve Hilton & Spencer Pratt: Fixing California, Cheaper Gas, Ballot Fraud & CA Republicans 55 min · 23 Sep 2026 · All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg

Optics of Alastair Clarkson's brunt sacking | The Eminently Sensible Phil Davis (23.09.26) 1 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Whateley

The Eminently Sensible Phil Davis | Whateley (23.09.26) 13 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Whateley

The impact of Zak Butters' homecoming | The Eminently Sensible Phil Davis (23.09.26) 1 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Whateley

Report any issue

Source

Recorded13 Feb 2017

Publisherfeeds.acast.com ↗

Handlerec:6553500

Show notes

In 2008, political pundit Don Martin penned a negative screed against former NBC wartime correspondent and at the time Alberta provincial electoral candidate Arthur Kent, aka the Scud Stud. Convinced that Martin had violated basic journalistic ethics, Kent took him and the CanWest news chain (later Postmedia) to court for defamation of character. Eight years later, an Alberta court ruled in Kent's favour. What issues drove Kent to undertake such an extensive - and likely expensive - lawsuit? And what does the ruling mean for journalists in Canada?Support CANADALAND: https://canadaland.com/joinSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in