Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Pricing
Podcast Image

ChatGPT Curious

Ep. 5: Can You Trust ChatGPT?

21 Aug 2025

Description

In this episode, I dig into whether you can trust ChatGPT, and what that question reveals about trust in general. From model changes and user backlash to the three pillars of trust (benevolence, integrity, competency), I share why double-checking is anon-negotiable and how personal responsibility plays into using AI. We talk about media incentives, misinformation, and why “important” is a slippery, subjective word when it comes to verifying the answers that ChatGPT gives you. Main Topics Covered User reactions and model changes after GPT-5 rollout ChatGPT as an assistant for known answers What “hallucination” actually mean The importance of verifying information Trust and misinformation online Social media’s role in shaping belief Media incentives for clicks over accuracy The foundations and four components of expertise The three components of trust Applying the trust framework to ChatGPT Where personal responsibility fits in Recent ChatGPT use: Suggestion mode and sentence checks Links & Resources for This Episode Subscribe to the ChatGPT Curious Newsletter: The Curious Companion Submit a Question Visit the Website Feeling curious AND generous?  Click here to support the podcast. Chapters (00:00:00) - ChatGPT Curious(00:00:38) - Chat GPT: Can You Trust GPT 5?(00:04:26) - Can You Trust ChatGPT?(00:10:27) - Can I Trust ChatGPT?(00:11:54) - Can We Trust? The Components of Expertise(00:14:12) - Three Components to Building Trust(00:18:27) - How to Use a Suggestion in Chat Gbt(00:20:00) - Curious Podcast: The Curious Companion

Audio
Featured in this Episode

No persons identified in this episode.

Transcription

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet

Help us prioritize this episode for transcription by upvoting it.

0 upvotes
🗳️ Sign in to Upvote

Popular episodes get transcribed faster

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.