Pink Sheet Executive Editor Derrick Gingery, Managing Editor Bridget Silverman, Senior Editor Sue Sutter and Editor-in-Chief Nielsen Hobbs consider the ongoing impact of the US Food and Drug Administration decision to drop vaccine expert Paul Offit and others from its advisory committee rosters (:32), as well as the substantial new detail in the latest batch of complete response letters for unapproved products that the agency released (12:47). More On These Topics From The Pink Sheet Offit’s VRBPAC Departure Raises Questions About Another HHS Panel Revamp: https://insights.citeline.com/pink-sheet/agency-leadership/us-fda/breaking-paul-offit-no-longer-member-of-us-fdas-vaccine-advisory-panel-WX3X3CIP6VCARJ7BPLXNQIQ2BQ/ US FDA Compounding Advisory Panel Hit Hardest By Recent Purges: https://insights.citeline.com/pink-sheet/product-reviews/us-advisory-committees/us-fda-compounding-advisory-panel-hit-hardest-by-recent-purges-OXBD4IXGFZCIDIMB6VXSOSVP6U/ 89 Complete Response Letters For Unapproved Drugs, One Huge Leap For US FDA Transparency: https://insights.citeline.com/pink-sheet/product-reviews/complete-response-letters/89-complete-response-letters-one-huge-leap-for-us-fda-transparency-for-unapproved-drugs-SLYA5LADMNDY3LKZ5TRUAWRRAU/

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related