We will learn what do passive investors look for in an operator as well as in a deal. We are interviewing Jeremy Roll, a passive real estate investor since 2002. Read this entire interview here: https://montecarlorei.com/5-things-passive-investors-look-for-in-a-syndication-operator-and-the-deal-itself/ You are a full time passive investor. That means that you are investing in other people’s deals. How do you evaluate an operator before investing with them? Great question. I want to stress the fact that the operator to me is even more important than the opportunity. I would say that’s number one. Number two is the actual opportunity itself. And I want to be clear, too, that the actual opportunity you’re investing in is very critical, clearly. But who you’re making a bet on when you invest passively is absolutely critical. And the reason is because typically when you’re investing passively in the way that I do it, I invest in what’s called syndications, and what that means is that they’re pulling a number of investors together, it could be several investors into an LLC and we’re typically buying a property. When you do that as an investor, you’re considered a limited partner, or in the LLC or the actual entity you’re investing in. 1. The first thing that I look for is an operator who is conservative, who is looking to under-promise and over-deliver and have longer term relationships with investors. I try to avoid operators who are aggressive with their assumptions and their projections to make the numbers look really good so that they can attract investors based on the projected returns, but that may or may not perform to projections. 2. From there, I ask a lot of questions. It’s very common for me to ask 150 to 200 questions about an opportunity. Some of those questions are going to be purposefully designed and asked. I don’t necessarily care about what the answer is, but more how they answer it and reading between the lines. If someone’s answering me in certain ways and saying “Well, we believe this property is going to do X and Y, but we we use this assumption which is much more conservative because we want to make sure we were conservative for investors. We think it’s going to over perform, but we want to set the right expectations.” That type of an answer to me is very valuable, it tells me their mindset. 3. I do background checks every time on all of the key managers and the opportunity. 4. I don’t usually invest with someone unless I met them in person at least once. And that’s because I am a very firm believer in doing a gut check after doing all your due diligence. Are you 100 percent sure you want invest with someone or there’s this 5 percent question mark, you don’t even know why, but your gut is telling you that it’s not a perfect scenario and maybe you should pass. That’s a very important thing. And I feel like meeting in person is an important part of that process. I know it’s very hard for some passive investors to do, but it’s part of my formula. 5. If you look at the legal documents, which are very important, sometimes they may tell you a little bit if this operator is looking to make this a win win structure for investors, whether it’s preferred return, profit splits. I could tell you some examples of some rules where it’s very obvious that they’re not trying to make anything in favor of investors. They’re working at it to maximize the situation for themselves. When I see an operator not trying to get a balance between the investors and themselves as far as profits, I’m just not aligned with the operator properly from a philosophical perspective. Jeremy Roll [email protected] --- Support

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related