This passage argues that the courts, rather than serving justice, have increasingly become instruments of relativism and majority rule, often harming victims more than criminals. It highlights Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.’s philosophy that the law is a game to be played according to its rules rather than a pursuit of justice, suggesting that justice is no longer viewed as absolute but as subject to human whims. The author warns that when courts treat law as a game, human lives and freedoms are at stake, and both moral and civil order suffer. The broader critique is that divorcing law from objective standards of good and evil leads to a destructive legal system that undermines true justice. #JusticeVsLaw #CourtCritique #HolmesianLaw #Relativism #FreedomAtRisk

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related