Episode 184: Philip Palmer on the Constitutional Doubts About the Government’s Internet Laws

episode

Law Bytes not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

Essentials: How to Assess & Improve All Aspects of Your Fitness | Dr. Andy Galpin 35 min · 17 Sep 2026 · Huberman Lab

#502 – Psychiatry, Insane Asylums, Mental Illness, ECT, Lobotomies, Freud & Jung 3h 43m · 17 Sep 2026 · Lex Fridman Podcast

Your partner wants profit. You want freedom. Now what? 22 min · 16 Sep 2026 · The Optometry Success Podcast

Board of County Supervisors Meeting - Work Session - Sep 15, 2026 3h 17m · 15 Sep 2026 · Prince William County Board of Supervisors

Finance and Budget Committee - Sep 15, 2026 1h 43m · 15 Sep 2026 · Prince William County Finance and Budget Committee

Sept. 15, 2026 Board of Supervisors Meeting 8h 46m · 15 Sep 2026 · Fairfax County Board of Supervisors

Report any issue

Source

Recorded13 Nov 2023

Publisherfeeds.castos.com ↗

Handlerec:7002396

Show notes

Is the Canadian government’s Internet legislation constitutional? That question arose during the hearings on Bills C-11 and C-18, but has taken on a new urgency given the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision involving an Alberta challenge to federal environmental assessment legislation. With limits on federal powers back in the spotlight, the vulnerability of the legislation requires further examination. Philip Palmer is a former Justice lawyer who appeared before the House of Commons committee studying Bill C-11 to make the case that the law does not fall within the scope of federal powers. He joins the Law Bytes podcast to explain why and what it might mean for the Internet streaming and news laws.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in