#042 - Pedro Domingos - Ethics and Cancel Culture

episode

Machine Learning Street Talk (MLST) not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

More from Machine Learning Street Talk (MLST)

VAEs Are Energy-Based Models? [Dr. Jeff Beck] 46 min · 25 Jan 2026

Abstraction & Idealization: AI's Plato Problem [Mazviita Chirimuuta] 53 min · 23 Jan 2026

Why Every Brain Metaphor in History Has Been Wrong [SPECIAL EDITION] 42 min · 23 Jan 2026

Adversarial Examples and Data Modelling - Andrew Ilyas (MIT) 1h 28m · 22 Aug 2024

All episodes from Machine Learning Street Talk (MLST) →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded11 Feb 2021

Publisheranchor.fm ↗

Handlerec:2107504

Show notes

Today we have professor Pedro Domingos and we are going to talk about activism in machine learning, cancel culture, AI ethics and kernels. In Pedro's book the master algorithm, he segmented the AI community into 5 distinct tribes with 5 unique identities (and before you ask, no the irony of an anti-identitarian doing do was not lost on us!). Pedro recently published an article in Quillette called Beating Back Cancel Culture: A Case Study from the Field of Artificial Intelligence. Domingos has railed against political activism in the machine learning community and cancel culture. Recently Pedro was involved in a controversy where he asserted the NeurIPS broader impact statements are an ideological filter mechanism. Important Disclaimer: All views expressed are personal opinions. 00:00:00 Caveating 00:04:08 Main intro 00:07:44 Cancelling culture is a culture and intellectual weakness 00:12:26 Is cancel culture a post-modern religion? 00:24:46 Should we have gateways and gatekeepers? 00:29:30 Does everything require broader impact statements? 00:33:55 We are stifling diversity (of thought) not promoting it. 00:39:09 What is fair and how to do fair? 00:45:11 Models can introduce biases by compressing away minority data 00:48:36 Accurate but unequal soap dispensers 00:53:55 Agendas are not even self-consistent 00:56:42 Is vs Ought: all variables should be used for Is 01:00:38 Fighting back cancellation with cancellation? 01:10:01 Intent and degree matter in right vs wrong. 01:11:08 Limiting principles matter 01:15:10 Gradient descent and kernels 01:20:16 Training Journey matter more than Destination 01:24:36 Can training paths teach us about symmetry? 01:28:37 What is the most promising path to AGI? 01:31:29 Intelligence will lose its mystery

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.