Have you ever felt judged—not for your mistakes or flaws—but for your strengths, education, or even how you speak? In this thoughtful and introspective episode, Michael Comyn explores the uncomfortable reality of being judged for having "too much" of something good. He explores the hidden biases that shape how we perceive each other, whether based on age, gender, accent, intelligence, race, or class. Drawing insights from psychology, Stoic philosophy, and Jungian thought, Michael examines the subtle and obvious ways we judge and are judged. Highlights include: Understanding top-down discrimination (structural bias) and bottom-up discrimination (personal resentments).How Carl Jung's concept of "projection" reveals our hidden insecurities.Stoic wisdom from Marcus Aurelius and Epictetus on choosing how to respond to judgment.The role of emotional intelligence in managing our biases, featuring insights from Daniel Goleman.Viktor Frankl's powerful reminder of the space between stimulus and response as a key to freedom. Quotes from this episode: "Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves." – Carl Jung"It's not what happens to you, but how you react to it that matters." – Epictetus"Between stimulus and response, there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response." – Viktor Frankl Join Michael in exploring how we can notice—and ultimately challenge—our quick judgments. Don't forget to subscribe, share, and keep minding the gap!

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related