In this very exciting book that I couldn’t put down - Neo-Traditionalism in Islam in the West: Orthodoxy, Spirituality, and Politics (Edinburgh University Press, 2023) - Walaa Quisay explores the trend of white male convert neo-traditionalist scholars in the West and their relationship with young seekers of sacred knowledge. She highlights the meanings of "tradition" that these scholars imagine and preach, even if it does not fit the reality of the Muslim cultures and countries that they imagine as purveyors of tradition. Walaa particularly tells the story of three main shaykhs - Hamza Yusuf, Abdal Hakim Murad, and Umar Faruq Abd-Allah. She analyzes their perceptions of modernity, which they insist is destructive to the tradition, their ideas being very similar to white conservative western thinkers. Their idea of the tradition involves a kind of authentic Islam and Islamic tradition that only existed in the past because they have been polluted with modernity, especially with ideas of gender and social equality and Black Lives Matter. These white male convert scholars’ Islam is deeply orientalist, as they scold Arab Muslims who no longer live in tents and enjoy modern technology, for example. For these shaykhs, authentic Islam can only be practiced without these modern innovations – which, to be sure, they themselves enjoy in the western countries where they live; it also necessitates a uniquely Moroccan aesthetic, such as in the clothing style, which is imposed on seekers from all over the world in these retreats. These seekers are individual Muslims of various backgrounds, from all around the world, who are eager to learn about their faith and to experience tradition and traditional Islam from these shaykhs. They pay large sums of money, depending on the retreat, to learn and connect with other Muslims. Notably, these shyakhs do not seem to think of the capitalism of the retreats and the costs as a modern practice that is worthy of rejection. The book’s primary argument is that the concept of tradition is in fact not entirely theological or stable but, for the neo-traditionalists, it represents the antidote to modernity. Additionally, Walaa shows that while the neo-traditionalist shaykhs present the story of modernity and tradition one way, which is that modernity is fundamentally harmful to the tradition, the seekers engage with it differently, some even expressing their critiques of the shaykhs’ arguments and the retreats at times. Throughout the book, Walaa describes the ways that these seekers receive and engage with the knowledge of the shyakhs. The seekers are tasked with the challenge of returning to modernity, to the real world, after the retreats, to practice their faith in a world the shaykhs teach them to escape, a world where politics of all forms, from gender and race and injustices, is harmful to the soul and should be avoided at all costs. The shyakhs are also very clear in their teachings that injustices are a punishment from God and those who experience them deserve them because they had distanced themselves from God. Yet, their appeal persists, and one of Walaa’s objectives in the book is to explain why. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/sociology

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related