3043: Two's Company. But Is It Necessarily Bad Company? by Dr. Timothy Loving with Luvze on Romantic Relationships

episode

Optimal Relationships Daily - Dating, Marriage and Parenting not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

More from Optimal Relationships Daily - Dating, Marriage and Parenting

2839: Reframing Rejection: Getting Rejected Doesn't Always Have to Hurt by Michael Davidson with Tiny Buddha on Emotional Resilience 7 min · 20 Dec 2025

All episodes from Optimal Relationships Daily - Dating, Marriage and Parenting →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded16 Jun 2026

Publisherrss.pdrl.fm

Handlerec:18874036

Show notes

Discover all of the podcasts in our network, search for specific episodes, get the Optimal Living Daily workbook, and learn more at: OLDPodcast.com. Episode 3043: Dr. Timothy Loving takes a closer look at research on cohabitation and argues that the data are more nuanced than they first appear. By examining the role of relationship length, children, and other important factors, he suggests that living together is not inherently harmful and that intentional commitment may matter more than cohabitation itself. Read along with the original article(s) here: https://www.luvze.com/twos-company-but-is-it-necessarily-bad-company/ Quotes to ponder: “If you’re asking because you’re worried about compatibility issues, then you might want to hold off.” “Put another way, couples that live together engage in more negative communication tactics slightly more than do those that do not live together.” “Why do we care about analyses with control variables that account for other factors? Well, because relationships are complex, a lot of factors (all working together) influence any particular outcome.” Episode references: Sliding vs. Deciding Blog: https://www.slidingvsdeciding.com/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.