Elisabeth Schellekens Dammann on Disagreement About Taste

episode

Philosophy Bites not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

Drs' Notes: How do athletes look after their ankles? 25 min · 22 Sep 2026 · What's Up Docs?

Day 265: The Sorrowful and Glorious Mysteries 12 min · 22 Sep 2026 · The Rosary in a Year (with Fr. Mark-Mary Ames)

How can you better look after your ankles? 31 min · 22 Sep 2026 · What's Up Docs?

Lena Dunham's Surrogacy, Channing Tatum & Joanna Howe 1h 9m · 22 Sep 2026 · Big Small Talk

John Cena (Best Of CVV) - Farewell Tour, Heel Turn, Never Seen 17, Gunther, The Rock, Favorite Match 1h 22m · 22 Sep 2026 · Insight with Chris Van Vliet

Bobby Fuller: Who Killed Bobby Fuller? 46 min · 22 Sep 2026 · DISGRACELAND

Report any issue

Source

Recorded18 Apr 2017

Publisherphilosophybites.libsyn.com ↗

Handlerec:5661328

Show notes

We certainly disagree about aesthetic judgments in a range of cases. But is anyone right? Is there no disputing about taste? Are all tastes equal? Elisabeth Schellekens Damman discusses disagreement about taste in this episode of Aesthetics Bites. Aesthetics Bites is a podcast series of interviews with top thinkers in the philosophy of art. It is a collaboration betwen the London Aesthetics Forum and Philosophy Bites and is made possible by a grant from the British Society of Aesthetics.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in