Paul Russell on David Hume's Treatise

episode

Philosophy Bites not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

The Songs of John Farnham: A Living Legend | Tony Cochrane (23.09.26) 7 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Whateley

Las 10 de Erazno, el Chokolatazo, Parodias, 1h 29m · 23 Sep 2026 · Erazno y La Chokolata El Podcast

Steve Hilton & Spencer Pratt: Fixing California, Cheaper Gas, Ballot Fraud & CA Republicans 55 min · 23 Sep 2026 · All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg

Optics of Alastair Clarkson's brunt sacking | The Eminently Sensible Phil Davis (23.09.26) 1 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Whateley

The Eminently Sensible Phil Davis | Whateley (23.09.26) 13 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Whateley

The impact of Zak Butters' homecoming | The Eminently Sensible Phil Davis (23.09.26) 1 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Whateley

Report any issue

Source

Recorded25 Apr 2011

Publisherphilosophybites.libsyn.com ↗

Handlerec:5661485

Show notes

The standard reading of David Hume's Treatise is that it reveals him as a sceptic and also as an advocate of a science of man. These two aspects seem to be in tension. The sceptical Hume seems opposed to the more positive contribution he makes about human nature. In this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast Paul Russell suggests a way of solving this riddle. Philosophy Bites is made in association with the Institute of Philosophy.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in