Should the Bears have gone for 2 and the win against the Rams? (Hour 1)

episode

Rahimi & Grote Show 38 min not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

More from Rahimi & Grote Show

Is Case Keenum going to start against the Eagles? | Take The North 39 min · 24 Sep 2026

5 On It & previewing Cubs-Marlins series finale (Hour 3) 29 min · 24 Sep 2026

Full Show — September 24, 2026 1h 52m · 24 Sep 2026

Brett Kollman breaks down Bears' struggles against Vikings, 'chaotic' NFC North 12 min · 24 Sep 2026

Danny Parkins sounds off on discourse surrounding Caleb Williams' injury (Hour 2) 40 min · 24 Sep 2026

Cubs squander chance to clinch playoff berth in losing to Marlins, 3-2 (Hour 1) 42 min · 24 Sep 2026

All episodes from Rahimi & Grote Show →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded20 Jan 2026

Publisherrss.amperwave.net ↗

Handlerec:15423076

Show notes

Leila Rahimi and Marshall Harris opened their show by pondering if the Bears should've gone for the two-point conversion and the win after scoring a touchdown late in regulation to pull within 17-16 against the Rams on Sunday in the divisional round. The Bears kicked the extra point instead before losing 20-17 loss that eliminated them from the playoffs. After that, they discussed the Bears defense's strong performance against the Rams before opening up the phone lines to Score listeners.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in