Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing
Podcast Image

SaaS Interviews with CEOs, Startups, Founders

1197 Sell your video content directly to your audience, $4.5m invested so far

03 Nov 2018

Transcription

Chapter 1: What is the main topic discussed in this episode?

0.031 - 19.148 Nathan Latka

Take more risks earlier. He is well, deeply embedded in LA and the idea of, again, folks coming up with their own content, putting together a sizzle reel, dropping 50, 60 grand, and then trying to enter a shit show to try and get in front of the right network person and maybe on a lottery ticket, getting a deal done that barely just covers their costs. He says there has to be a better way.

0

19.569 - 41.158 Nathan Latka

Build Streamy. I don't know if I agree. He's put in four and a half million bucks of his own money. He's more aggressive than I am. I'd want to make money before I put in a dollar, but call me cheap. He's aggressive. He's got a big vision. We'll see what happens. This is the Top Entrepreneurs Podcast, where founders share how they started their companies and got filthy rich or crash and burn.

0

42.421 - 64.682 Nathan Latka

Each episode features revenue numbers, customer counts, and other insider information that creates business news headlines. We went from a couple hundred thousand dollars to 2.7 million. I had no money when I started the company. It was $160 million, which is the size of many IPOs. We're a bit strapped. We have like 22,000 customers.

0

65.152 - 85.964 Nathan Latka

With over 5 million downloads in a very short amount of time, major outlets like Inc. are calling us the fastest growing business show on iTunes. I'm your host, Nathan Latka, and here's today's episode. Hello, everyone. My guest today is JP Fada. He's the founder of a company called Streamy with a mission to leverage technology to create new entertainment experiences.

0

86.345 - 98.972 Nathan Latka

He's personally funded and operated multiple startups, including a production company, creating non-scripted TV shows. He is talented in the creation and deployment of cross-functional teams to launch concepts to market. JP, are you ready to take us to the top?

99.138 - 100.9 JP Fatta

I am, brother. Let's do it.

100.92 - 111.17 Nathan Latka

All right. Talk to me about this. So let's just start. Let me let you kind of just whiff for a second. Largest non-scripted TV show you've worked on that most people have probably heard of before is what?

112.632 - 132.913 JP Fatta

We were involved. Well, actually, we were behind the scenes. So there was a couple of projects that we worked on, which kind of led to the creation of this. One of them was Tobacco Wars, which is probably the largest one. that we, um, we worked on and it was kind of our entry into the actual industry itself. Right.

132.933 - 156.634 JP Fatta

So when we were doing these non-scripted, it was because a contact was kind of, um, brought to me, we had a small incubation company domiciled in South Florida. And one of the guys, we were more focused, he's focusing on tech. Um, but one of the guys brought somebody who was an ex film producer, an ex actor, sorry, turned film producer. And he was trying to break out in reality based programming.

Chapter 2: How did JP Fatta start his journey in the entertainment industry?

304.169 - 307.995 JP Fatta

because they're trying to get the credits, right? The EP credits, the producer credits.

0

308.035 - 321.195 Nathan Latka

So what would like an HGTV or an NBC, if they're buying an eight episode pilot, right? And really that purchase price is just covering the expenses of production. I mean, how much does it cost to produce a 47 minute episode eight times?

0

322.797 - 337.887 JP Fatta

Well, I mean, the budgets are all over the map, right? Depending on the quality, depending, most of it is really gonna be the talent. So at the beginning, you could probably negotiate 200,000 per episode, 100,000 per episode. but it can go up there. It can go up to a million dollars per episode depending on the talent plus, right?

0

338.368 - 352.222 JP Fatta

But at the very small level, and that's why non-scripted was so attractive to these networks is that the price point to create that content was very low, right? So they can actually create a lot of, and then it's all ad revenue driven anyway for them.

0

352.482 - 356.025 Nathan Latka

So where does Streamy come into all this? What's the company doing? How do you make money?

356.506 - 362.712 JP Fatta

Yeah, so essentially what we did is we realized through this path that we were actually,

362.978 - 390.775 JP Fatta

trying to um to we realized how tough it was to actually break into the industry on the traditional side during that same process we also realized that there was a heavy migration to digital right so things were moving towards digital um this was around the same time facebook was ipo had its ipo right um so you were getting a lot of of content that was picture driven even on social media video content was probably 30 to 40 percent of the overall content now it's eight

391.025 - 403.245 JP Fatta

80% plus, right? People aren't even watching as many pictures as they are unless they're Instagram, but most of it is video-based content. So we saw this entire shift happening, but we saw that there were inherent problems with this shift happening, right?

403.265 - 417.167 JP Fatta

So even present today, a creator or a publisher that's actually trying to develop content, to distribute content digitally, still has to go through certain gatekeepers as they did on the traditional side.

Chapter 3: What challenges do creators face when pitching content to networks?

744.753 - 759.681 JP Fatta

So where we're different in a lot of people is the tools that you get, number one, to package your content. The distribution plot that we put together, which is going to be streaming, is one umbrella ecosystem and all of the different monetization and marketing promotional tools that you get.

0

760.002 - 770.695 JP Fatta

And in addition to that, supportive services the company will do from branded entertainment, product placement, revenue analysis, and working with our publishing partners to maximize their revenue potential.

0

771.215 - 776.622 Nathan Latka

You mentioned you're thinking about doing a raise later this year. How do you think about how much you want to raise and what would you use the money on?

0

777.479 - 789.328 JP Fatta

We are talking through that. So I don't have specifics on the actual number that we want to raise, but it will be north of $10 million. We're also exploring some creative opportunities right now because part of our technology stack

0

789.798 - 810.533 JP Fatta

that we're developing on has elements of data, big data and analytics, which is, again, going to be given to the publishers for free so they can utilize that as insights to create better content. The second is AI or machine learning and elements of AI that's going to be in place into that for a more immersive consumer experience That's more preference driven.

810.553 - 818.127 JP Fatta

I don't know if it's you, but most people will tell you that they spend more time looking for something to watch than actually watching content on these platforms.

818.367 - 829.407 Nathan Latka

How do you, though, figure it out? I mean, if you're going to raise $10 million, your pre-revenue, I mean, you've got to figure out how to convince people that you're worth 30 or 40 million bucks without any revenue if you don't want to get really diluted. How do you do that?

830.112 - 836.466 JP Fatta

we, we thought, well, first of all, we think we're worth a lot more than that, but, um, yeah, but JP, I'm just, I'm just talking from my audience.

836.586 - 840.736 Nathan Latka

They're going to be listening and going, he has no revenue. How's he worth anything more than zero?

Chapter 4: How has technology changed the way content is produced and distributed?

888.09 - 888.29 Nathan Latka

Right.

0

888.871 - 900.282 JP Fatta

I agree. But this, this is quantifiable, right? Cause there's enough data out there through what's being done in the, in the ecosystem or in the digital sphere to actually quantify some of this analysis as well. Do it for me.

0

902.017 - 907.786 Nathan Latka

Like, what are you quantifying? What are you measuring? Is like minutes, watch number of publishers you've projected are going to be using you. I mean, what is it?

0

908.287 - 919.564 JP Fatta

Yeah, well, we have a duplication model. So simply put, we have a self-managed system. That's an invite only. Then we have a hierarchical structure within that, that we can power multiple different levels of publishers.

0

919.604 - 934.254 JP Fatta

So we can power anyone from a channel, a influencer, all the way up to a broadcaster that owns a broadcast that bundles networks, that bundles channels, that bundles content, right? So within that hierarchical structure, we could power multiple levels of businesses.

934.734 - 958.295 JP Fatta

Within each level of business, we have some revenue analysis on each type of publisher level and what they mean in terms of a revenue potential return, or sorry, a revenue potential to the company. So we've taken that analysis and built a financial model based on that, and then it becomes purely a duplication model at that point.

958.315 - 960.137 Nathan Latka

So what valuation do you hope to raise at?

960.623 - 966.502 JP Fatta

We're hoping to raise probably north, but again, the audience is gonna think we're crazy.

966.522 - 968.007 Nathan Latka

No, that's okay. What is it? What's the number?

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.