What language is acceptable in politics, and how has it changed?

episode

Saturday Extra - Separate stories podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

The Songs of John Farnham: A Living Legend | Tony Cochrane (23.09.26) 7 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Whateley

Las 10 de Erazno, el Chokolatazo, Parodias, 1h 29m · 23 Sep 2026 · Erazno y La Chokolata El Podcast

Steve Hilton & Spencer Pratt: Fixing California, Cheaper Gas, Ballot Fraud & CA Republicans 55 min · 23 Sep 2026 · All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg

Optics of Alastair Clarkson's brunt sacking | The Eminently Sensible Phil Davis (23.09.26) 1 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Whateley

The Eminently Sensible Phil Davis | Whateley (23.09.26) 13 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Whateley

The impact of Zak Butters' homecoming | The Eminently Sensible Phil Davis (23.09.26) 1 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Whateley

Report any issue

Source

Recorded12 Sep 2025

Publisherabc.net.au ↗

Handlerec:4134834

Show notes

As the Liberal Party continues to manage the fallout from Jacinta Nampijinpa Price's comments about Indian migration, we explore how the boundaries of politically permissible language have shifted over time; from the White Australia policy, through Whitlam-era multiculturalism, to Pauline Hanson's anti-immigration rhetoric and John Howard's dog whistles.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in