Will AI Replace Human Artists? One Study Says Not Yet

episode

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

recent transcribed audio

A.I. Safety Goes Mainstream + a ‘Hard Fork’ Exit AMA 1h 25m · 18 Sep 2026 · Hard Fork

AWP: Beyond the Exam Room: Purpose, Myopia, and Population Health 54 min · 17 Sep 2026 · EyeCode Media

Planning Commission Meeting - Sep 17, 2026 1h 11m · 17 Sep 2026 · Leesburg Planning Commission

Heritage Commission - Sep 14, 2026 1h 57m · 17 Sep 2026 · Loudoun County Board Committees and Advisory Boards

Historic District Review Committee - Sep 14, 2026 1h 36m · 17 Sep 2026 · Loudoun County Board Committees and Advisory Boards

Planning Commission Work Session - Sep 17, 2026 4h 39m · 17 Sep 2026 · Loudoun County Planning Commission

Report any issue

Source

Recorded24 Jun 2025

Publisherfeeds.megaphone.fm

Handlerec:10178297

Show notes

AI-generated art is sweeping the internet. With programs like Midjourney or DALL-E, users can generate images from text prompts in seconds. Should working artists be alarmed by these tools? Sheena Iyengar, a professor at Columbia Business School, says not quite. In a recent study, she had participants rate AI-generated art versus human-made art — and found that people still like human-made art more. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related