How do you view science? Is it a unified discipline that relies on a single method, or are the sciences more diverse than the standard image implies? In this episode of the podcast, Samara meets with the University of Melbourne’s own Dr Kristian Camilleri to talk about the Disunity of Science. Kristian highlights the problems with a monolithic vision of science and argues for seeing the sciences as diverse and differently evolving practices. This 'disunity' becomes clear when we appreciate that scientific disciplines often employ very different methodologies and have developed in divergent ways. The disunity of science also has practical implications, as scientists may face barriers when collaborating if they hold to an overly simplified model of science. Recognising science as highly variegated allows for a more helpful and accurate understanding.Follow the links below to learn more about Kristian Camilleri and his workInterview with Kristian: ‘Unpacking the History of Quantum Mechanics’ 2021Kristian's Book: Heisenberg & the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics 2009On the Disunity of ScienceEdited collection: The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power 1996Article: ‘The Disunity of Nature and Science’ 2002A transcript of the podcast can be found here.Thanks for listening to The HPS Podcast. You can find more about us on our website, Bluesky, Instagram and Facebook feeds. This podcast would not be possible without the support of School of Historical and Philosophical Studies at the University of Melbourne and the Hansen Little Public Humanities Grant scheme. Music by ComaStudio. Website HPS Podcast | hpsunimelb.org

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related