Ep. 304: Dworkin v. Hart on Legal Judgment (Part Two)

episode

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

More from The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

PEL Presents Philosophy vs. Theater w/ David Epstein 1h 1m · 25 Sep 2026

Ep. 400: Dennett Rejects Qualia (Part Two) 51 min · 21 Sep 2026

PEL Presents Closereads: Late Dennett on Consciousness (Part One) 55 min · 20 Sep 2026

PEL Presents PMP#230: Gettin' Furious 49 min · 18 Sep 2026

Ep. 400: Dennett Rejects Qualia (Part One) 52 min · 14 Sep 2026

PEL Presents PvI#124: Navel Evaluation (Our Season 5 Finale) 53 min · 12 Sep 2026

All episodes from The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded21 Nov 2022

Publisherpartiallyexaminedlife.libsyn.com ↗

Handlerec:5514468

Show notes

Continuing on Roland Dworkin's "The Model of Rules" (1967) and Scott J. Shapiro's "The 'Hart-Dworkin' Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed" (2007), plus some of Dworkin's "Hard Cases" (1977). How do Hartians respond to Dworkin's initial attack? Can Hart's theory incorporate the fact that judges consult their culture's moral standards without making the law dependent on morality? Get more at partiallyexaminedlife.com. Visit partiallyexaminedlife.com/support to get ad-free episodes and tons of bonus discussion including the supporter-exclusive part three to this episode.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in