PEL Presents PvI#107: Mary and Mark Argue About Arguing

episode

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

More from The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

Ep. 400: Dennett Rejects Qualia (Part Two) 51 min · 21 Sep 2026

PEL Presents Closereads: Late Dennett on Consciousness (Part One) 55 min · 20 Sep 2026

PEL Presents PMP#230: Gettin' Furious 49 min · 18 Sep 2026

Ep. 400: Dennett Rejects Qualia (Part One) 52 min · 14 Sep 2026

PEL Presents PvI#124: Navel Evaluation (Our Season 5 Finale) 53 min · 12 Sep 2026

PEL Presents NEM#260: Jacqui Hunt (Single Gun Theory) Now Master of Her Synth Domain 1h 4m · 11 Sep 2026

All episodes from The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded13 Dec 2025

Publisherpartiallyexaminedlife.libsyn.com ↗

Handlerec:14605416

Show notes

Is argumentation essential to philosophy? Should you always be open to arguments challenging your beliefs? We act out a few symbiotic scenarios and reflect back on our last couple of episodes. Plus animal facts, complaining to your significant other about exes, astrology prejudice, sexual harassment videos, and on-stage self-pleasure. Hear more at philosophyimprov.com. Support the podcast and listen ad-free at philosophyimprov.com/support. Sponsor: Get the holiday deal (up to 50% off!) at MasterClass.com/IMPROV.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in